In response to:

Problems Solutions and Trade Offs II

There is no separation between "personhood" and humanity. All human beings are persons. We are human from the moment of conception and thus we are persons from first conception. To declare that some human beings are, somehow, not actually human is to declare that rights are not inherent to humanity but conditional based how human someone may or may not be. There is a long and bloody history to show us what happens when a society decides that some human beings aren't fully human.
bgmk Wrote: Sep 10, 2012 6:25 PM
Exactly the line taken by Duke's Premier Ethicist Stanley Hauerwas.
At bottom, the end of this slippery slope is the Death Camp for "life not worthy of life."
Note also the danger in appealing to THE STATE as the arbiter here.
Americans MUST argue this CONSTITUTIONALLY or Doom the Republic.
The ONLY thing that SHOULD be at stake here is WHEN DOES a Developing Baby become a HUMAN BEING with HUMAN RIGHTS.
NOTHING else is germane, this is about HUMAN Rights under our Constitution, it has NOTHING TO DO WITH "Women's Rights".
Most of my columns are meant to expose the hypocrisy of self-described liberals who have taken over our institutions of higher learning. However, on some occasions, I attempt to address misguided thinking among self-described conservatives. An example is my recent column “Romney and the Rapist,” which was described by many readers as either “weird” or “convoluted” or both. Those descriptions are indeed accurate and reflect the intention behind the controversial essay. It was my intention to write a column that would identify absurd arguments as a means of drawing out the flawed reasoning of those who would support Romney’s proposed rape...