In response to:

Al Gore Warming

Exactly. Instead they're crying about obesity and warming. The doomsayers have been wrong every time. Why should we believe them this time?
TommyMaq Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 12:44 PM
Google "dunning kruger effect" for the simple explanation of the relevant dynamic.

"Climate science" is a new interdisciplinary field supposedly created by an amalgamation of meteorology, oceanography, marine biology, astrophysics and geology.

In fact, most of the actual scientists in those fields disagree with the AGW mantra emanating from the climate scientists. Most 'climate science' starts by assuming AGW, so that they can calculate the presumed effects.

Scientific objectivity isn't important to them, which means reaching trustworthy conclusions isn't important to them.
Mother of 4 -- the original Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 11:21 AM
What baffles me is how anyone can possibly get to be called a "climate expert" without every having taken any 100-level geology courses.
AliveInHim Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 10:52 AM
They're wrong on this, were wrong on T2K, Alar, Red Dye #2, eggs, coffee, dietary fat (vitamin k for example is soluble only in fat), ethanol, the War on Poverty, cyclamates, and countless other crusades.

And they call US ignorant...!

In October one of the main culprits in the global warming hoax published new data that undermines their own theory of global warming. The UK’s MET Office, more formally called the UK's National Weather Service, updated global temperatures for 2012 and the new dataset shows that an “unlikely” event has occurred, according to their own models: Global warming has been halted for 15 years and counting.

While the MET Office accused critics of cherry-picking a starting point and nitpicked about language-for example the Daily Mail reported that the “Met Office report [was] quietly released,” while the Met office whined they just...