In response to:

Ending Gun Violence Requires Commitment, Not All of it Voluntary

Moonbat Exterminator Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:10 PM
Gun bans, like the gun free zones, are nothing but cosmetic measures devised by libs to enable them to feel good about themselves by saying "We did something". The "doing something" is not just a limit on the depth of their thinking, but carries no evaluation as to whether or not that "something" actually ameliorates the problem du jour. In practical terms, the less effective those measures are the more vociferously they are defended by the progs who concoct them.
Robert97 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 2:38 PM
Moonbat is right. Not only are many lib cures worthless, sometimes they make the problem worse! See, for example, LBJ's War on Poverty.

Ralph Nader remarked, "The problem with government programs is there is no failing grade."
Truckman Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 3:53 PM
" sometimes they make the problem worse!"
I'd have to say it's more like ALWAYS. See,for example,America,in the last 5 years.

The good news is: Obama and the Senate Democrats have no intention of passing more idiotic gun legislation in response to the Newtown massacre. The bad news is that they also have no intention of passing any legislation about the mentally ill, which would actually do something to reduce these mass shootings.

Instead, the Democrats will jawbone about "assault weapons" and other meaningless gun laws for the sole purpose of scaring soccer moms into hating the National Rifle Association. Expect to hear a lot about Republicans preferring "the gun lobby" to "children." (Which is evidently not at all like...