Bottom line is that when there is a shooting, police need all the tools possible to track down the shooter. People can have guns, with appropriate restrictions on their use. But we need to establish a system by which any gun linked to a crime can be traced to an owner, period! Anyone caught with a gun that is not registered should be up for at least a high misdemeanor, if not a felony charge. And yes, there should be very aggressive enforcement of such provisions, especially in high crime urban areas. Police ought to be able to setup checkpoints for guns in these areas, just as they do when stopping traffic to look for drunk drivers. So yes, this means univeral registration, which is NOT an infringement on the right to bear...

No that's not how Democrats and Liberals would react to this incident - that the 16 yr old kid should have waited for the police. That's BS! There's obviously something else going on with the school district. The 16 yr old is a hero, in the eyes of the vast majority of Democrats and Liberals, period.

Particularly for the crazies who have a choice in which weapon to use to attack a school.

No it's not. You do that and you'll be in the slammer for life.

You and Donald Trump still out there in Lalaland?

BS. The author provided absolutely no examples or evidence of what he was talking about. It was just more of the same right wing fantasy-speak. And all of you who give each other high fives on these sites and can't imagine any other points of view, as far as I am concerned, belong to the NMKNA (Narrow Minded Know Nothings of America).

In four parts, the only practical measure mentioned by Norris was the posting of guards at schools. Nothing else discussed contains anything that could be implemented in a logical way.

While this may address some domestic situations, it has nothing to do with street violence and/or mass shootings. It will take effective gun control measures to do something about this, like it or not.

In other words, I guess you're figuring the country would be better of without GM in business today

That may be true, but where do you think the ultimate profits wind up? Bottom line - buying a prius is a net ouflow of money from this country.

Anyone who thinks that a new concept vehicle is going to be produced as cheaply as today's conventional car has NO CLUE about the nature of research and development, and the cost of materials. In fact, if they had websites and blogs back in the early part of the 20th century, the same lot of you who are getting a chuckle out of the slow start being experienced by the Volt would probably have been yukking it up over these "ridiculous horseless carriages", suggesting to these fledling auto companies and people nervy enough to buy one to "get a horse".