In response to:

Biden's Faulty Lifeguard Logic

mjohansen Wrote: Jan 11, 2013 10:34 PM
So if a proposed government regulation costs just one life, is that a compelling reason to not do it? For example, if I can identify just one person who has died while waiting for a new drug to be approved by the FDA, then it follows that the FDA must be abolished, right?

"As the president said, if your actions result in only saving one life, they're worth taking," Vice President Joe Biden declared on Wednesday as he previewed what his commission on gun violence might actually do.

"There are executive orders, there's executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the Cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required."

Biden insisted that it is a moral imperative for the White House...

Saturday, May 18 | 04:12 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 04:12 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 04:12 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 04:12 AM ET