Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Greed

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 24, 2012 11:34 AM
Not exactly, though clearly the image of big corporate criminals being overwhelming to control is what may need figuring I agree with Stossel on the potency of markets where consumers are fully informed & able to choose between alternatives of significant difference but clearly the idea that govt are the 'controllers' is in need of revision It used to be thought that bigger govt was needed to control criminally outrageous corporate abuses, but what we have found out (Stossel too) is that bigger govt is just impossible for US CITIZENS TO CONTROL So corporate criminals have taken over the government AND the big parties (Dem/GOP) so citizens barely know what's going on & have no real choices Vote Libertarian & save our internet & we'll thrive
In response to:

Bad Rules

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 10:11 AM
Too bad the 'commission' that supposedly 'educates' we the public CENSORED THE CANDIDATES WE THE PUBLIC WERE ALLOWED TO SEE AND HEAR... that moderator would have been stomped on by third party candidates with their own fact-checking.. and multiple voiced opposition right on stage.. ttyl
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 12:00 PM
We would second your idea of supporting nullification BUT ONLY IF WE DITCH "the two wings of our one-party system clearly have complete control of the presidential selection, it's obviously futile to vote for one or the other of their hand-picked choices" as you have correctly identified... otherwise nullification is overly costly in lives and hyperinflationary disaster..... ttyl... vote Rand Paul's and Ron Paul's own private choices.. which does include Gary Johnson, 2012...
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 11:50 AM
If you mean that Ryan at least produced a budget, well that does indicate some math ability, just no economic/finance/free market understanding because his budget doesn't even come close to getting us out of this mess in any decent amount of time. How can you be grateful for Ryan's mess WHEN YOU HAD THE ALTERNATIVE OF libertarian-souled RAND PAUL'S BUDGET.... you still qualify as sheeple IR YOU VOTE FOR ROMNEY/RYAN... ttyl
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 11:45 AM
rotfl... obama and romney are about as different as coke and pepsi... both big govt lying frauds.. just one is marketed to the urban-market and the other to the suburban-rural market.. your argument falls apart on precisely that point. You are right about Romney never being libertarian, BUT THAT'S WHAT IS NEEDED... Be Libertarian with Gary Johnson... he's got the track record that we need... his administration ended with a large surplus, yet he was popular, not like what will happen when our big-spenders drive our credit rating to junk... he got the people of his state JOBS with double digit growth that outpaced every other administration/state.. we need Johnson.. all the rest are DOOM... ttyl
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 11:38 AM
Look at history... Teddy Roosevelt was not the 'lesser of evils' as you are telling us we must choose at this crisis time.. it doesn't take that much time to eliminate parties that have become so blatantly corrupted. Look at history.. Vote Libertarian Johnson and be decently not 'an accomplice' in big government bullies' crimes... ttyl
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 11:32 AM
"all Ind-women-lbrtrn-cnstn-prty should-must vote for M-R"... you weren't listening to Stossel... it's the other way around ! and since you favor your shorthand, we'll put it to you in those terms: all small govt GOPers should vote with the TPrty-cheatd Dems-ind-women-lbrtrn-cnstn-prty and elect Gary Johnson We can do it. Lil ol Perot got 19% of the vote and didn't have the skills of Johnson nor Johnson's impressive track record (turning NM around financially, plus double-digit job growth, plus smaller govt), Perot had just the debate stage... but we have the internet... Teddy Roosevelt did it, Gary Johnson can do it.. vote Johnson..
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 11:20 AM
Nope, he's leading up to the logical conclusion, namely that THE WHOLE TWO-PARTY MONOPOLY HAS TO GO... The only candidate that supports the principles that Stossel is laying clearly on the table is THE LIBERTARIAN GARY JOHNSON... but you're not supposed to notice and certainly not to know-this... The Libertarians are the only way we're going to get out of this mess without the coming disasters the 'big-govt' minions like the 'lesser of evils' has brought us.. Vote Gary Johnson, throw ALL the big-govt SCAM ARTISTS OUT THE DOOR with their obvious lying promises.
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

MJ117 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 11:12 AM
There is no Rule of Law left. The courts are full of Crony Judges who blatantly break the law in their Orders and Decrees in order to cover up the criminality of the bureaucratic bullies. So no one is 'protected by the law' anymore. Judging by Ohio and reading Rand Paul's book on Government Bullies at the federal level AS WELL. Where did you get the idea that we should believe in your illusions and salute when we're told: 'we're from the government and we're here to protect you'.... rotfl... ttyl
Want to see a conspicuous infiltration into our wellbeing in the U.S. that you will be called a racist if you point it out? Look around hospital ERs & ICUs especially in areas where veterans predominate in the population Look at the nationalities of the MDs having control where your own life or the life of your family are balanced on a thread How much would you think a Muslim with a history of animosity toward your people & clear hatred of rural communities supporting veterans would do to sabotage your possibility of survival, would enjoy your suffering being increased Why is it that *malpractice* cases in the courts have been increasing rapidly beyond the supply of lawyers We saw racially hateful remarks put in patient records
In response to:

Improving Life for Workers

MJ117 Wrote: May 30, 2012 12:46 PM
The way Mondragon got started was that the local workers were convinced to form credit unions which were limited to financial support for startup of co-op businesses. Workers then could borrow, as needed, what the credit union figured would be a reasonable capitalization of reasonable startup companies -- about the price-tag of a work truck -- joked that it will always be easier to rally politically inclined people behind unrealistic, revolutionary causes than to rally them around subtle economic progress, because no crowd marches behind a banner proclaiming, "Toward a Marginally Improved Society!" Subtleties are hoaxes of the suits of the academic world Multigenerational families, life-directed learning & MONDRAGON
Previous 11 - 20 Next
Tuesday, May 21 | 04:36 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 04:36 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 04:36 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 04:36 PM ET