In response to:

NAACP Requires Photo I.D. to See Holder Speak in State Being Sued Over Voter ID

misnomer58 Wrote: Jul 11, 2012 5:29 PM
I fully support the voter ID cause, I truly do. I also support the Voting Rights Act of 1965. You simply CAN NOT make changes the will create any type of barrier that impedes even ONE American citizen from crasting their vote. You CAN NOT make changes to the voting process in the middle of a presidential race. You just can't do it. BY LAW you just can't do it. You folks have had F-O-U-R- - Y-E-A-R-S to address this concern, And you waited until...what, this year?
Michael1957MN Wrote: Jul 11, 2012 10:43 PM
EXCUUUUUUUSE ME. We "waited"? Dude, ya'll done gone bumped yor head an got brain damaged or somthin.

No, seriously, we conservatives, we Constitutionalists have been trying for a long time to get voter ID laws in place nationwide, yet have been blocked at every turn by the ACLU, NAACP, the Holder DOJ, and other liberal activists/judges. No, misnomer58, we did not "wait until" this year. And YES we can and should require ID for everyone who votes everywhere period.
John in Gwinnett,Ga Wrote: Jul 11, 2012 9:07 PM
Name one person that cannot get a picture ID or does not need one under the age of 18?

Earlier today, Attorney General Eric Holder addressed the NAACP Nation Convention at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. What did media need in order to attend? That's right, government issued photo identification (and a second form of identification too!), something both Holder and the NAACP stand firmly against when it comes to voting. Holder's DOJ is currently suing Texas for "discriminatory" voter ID laws. From the press release:

All media must present government-issued photo I.D. (such as a driver’s license) as well as valid media credentials. Members of the media must RSVP to receive press...

Related Tags: Eric Holder NAACP Mitt Romney