In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

Miranda Rose Smith Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 2:21 AM
The reason that the sculptor depicted a policewoman urinating is that he had a childish desire to insult authority figures. He got the award because the people who gave it shared that childish desire. But you have to admit that a urinating little boy is, and has been for decades, a very common fountain ornament in the United States. It has nothing to do with attitudes towaqrds public nudity.
S. A. Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 8:23 AM
And in that vein, I do not find a "little boy urinating fountain" to be attractive either.
wtf2 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 9:27 AM
I agree, I have NEVER seen the appeal of that image.
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity