In response to:

When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?

minirth Wrote: May 23, 2013 1:39 PM
Get rid of the anchor baby law and limit chain/family immigration. Do not consider any form of amnesty, citizenship, or eligibility for government/financial aid until the border is secure. And the illegals go to the BACK of the line. I don't know all the answers to the immigration problem, but wouldn't that be a good place to start?
John Not the Damned Senator Edwards Wrote: May 23, 2013 3:19 PM
The BACK OF THE LINE being back across the border, one would hope
America is Over Wrote: May 23, 2013 3:01 PM
Anchor babies are a fiction created by an activist court.
jbowman261 Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:08 PM
First you need to get rid of the traitors in DC, join the Tea Party and Modern Militia Movement.
No-Way-Jose Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:25 PM
The same tea party that helped put Rubio and Flake in office? Or how about the tea party that put Rand Paul in office -- yeah he's all for amnesty as well.
Dreadnaught011 Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:46 PM


Haha! Modern! Movement!

Get real, Boy-San! First you need to get a clue!

Dreadnaught011 Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:49 PM


At last! One reasonable post!

Yeah, Jose! These morons all think they're Tarzan of the Apes! They're hoping a Civil War starts so they can swing from their vines! Lol!!!

jbowman261 Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:54 PM
Have you seen the numerous Tea Party groups that oppose this amnesty? http://immigrationreform.com/2013/05/21/150-conservative-leaders-organizations-sign-anti-amnesty-letter/

Hopefully they have learned their lesson with Rubio and Flake and will be smarter next time. Paul is not supporting this current bill.
No-Way-Jose Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:58 PM
A few cosmetic changes and Paul will be on board -- he's already stated his support for amnesty/legalization.
DonMann Wrote: May 23, 2013 3:12 PM
Your Right!! Rand is also supporting amnesty, so I will NOT support him either.. Stop the invasion and this treasonous bill..
Dreadnaught011 Wrote: May 23, 2013 1:43 PM


Start by understanding how little power you have. Your suggestions in this post are non-starters; because you aren't in authority.

Ron-CA Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:24 PM
Dread...it may have escaped your attention but you have no power here either...except for that at the polling booth...
Dreadnaught011 Wrote: May 23, 2013 2:44 PM


I understand, Ron-CA; it has my attention.

Minirth thinks,

"Get rid of the anchor baby law and limit chain/family immigration."

THAT'S a non-starter; hopeless. All babies born in the US have a constitutional guarantee of legal citizenship. YES, carved in STONE.

Do not consider any form of amnesty, citizenship, or eligibility for government/financial aid until the border is secure."

THAT'S already BEEN CONSIDERED.
Doesn't anybody understand? Not MY power, or yours; the Legislature of bipartisan senators is finished considering!


John Not the Damned Senator Edwards Wrote: May 23, 2013 3:18 PM
At least we have the power to kick the a**es of guys like you
Dreadnaught011 Wrote: May 23, 2013 3:24 PM


Dream on, Sleeping Beauty.
Alex_P Wrote: May 23, 2013 5:47 PM
Dreadnaught011 Wrote:
" All babies born in the US have a constitutional guarantee of legal citizenship. YES, carved in STONE."

Huh? This is the most convoluted reading of 14th amendment possible.
Unfortunately, it is how SCOTUS reads it, but they were wrong before. It only takes a will of congress (yes, I know, in short supply currently) to change it. It is not as if the amendment itself needs to be repealed or amended.