Arizona's SB 1070 anti-illegal immigration bill heads to the Supreme Court today for arguments. The legislation has been dubbed one of the nation's "most controversial" and most "anti-immigrant" laws in the country, but the truth is, the legislation really isn't controversial at all. SB 1070 simply allows local law enforcement, the same officers who deal with the criminal consequences of illegal immigration everyday, to ask people regardless of skin color, for proof of citizenship after a crime has been committed (for more information about what's really happening on the border and what our local law enforcement officers are up against,...
I just finished Jan Brewer's book, "Scorpions for Breakfast", and it converted me to a believer and supporter of SB 1070. The quote from the administration: "human rights and the **rights of law-abiding citizens and immigrants** makes it crystal clear. Obama doesn't see a difference between legal and illegal immigration; whereas those on the front lines of this border war clearly do. Illegal immigrants committed a crime when they crossed the border illegally. As for having to show "papers", I live in Texas, where you are required (I believe) to carry a state or federally-issued ID at all times. I've never been stopped for a traffic violation and not been asked to produce my driver's license, regardless of what state I was in
- New solution to border crisis: Send U.S. officials to Honduras to give kids refugee status? Allahpundit Jul 24, 2014
- Boehner accuses White House of sabotaging Veterans Affairs bill Noah Rothman Jul 24, 2014
- NFL suspends Ray Rice for two games in domestic-assault case Ed Morrissey Jul 24, 2014
- Great news from Hillary: The Russian reset worked Allahpundit Jul 24, 2014
- Thursday TEMS: Duane Patterson, Daniel Garza, Mike McFadden Ed Morrissey Jul 24, 2014
- FEC Chairman sounds alarm to Hot Air: There’s a ‘move afoot to constrict press freedoms’ Noah Rothman Jul 24, 2014