1 - 10 Next
In response to:

'Super Tuesday'

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Mar 03, 2012 8:26 PM
Door, rear end, yadda yadda yadda! Amen, Dr. Sowell, NEWT 2012! The only logical choice! (And one of only two principled choices.)
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836752 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836726 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836753 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836751 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836750 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836749 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836745 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836743 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
In response to:

Keep the Faith

Milo D. Cooper Wrote: Sep 04, 2011 8:59 AM
Washington, yes. Lincoln, obviously. Reagan, of course. Franklin RooseveltjQuery152019811182422563434_1315139836742 NO. FDR was the nexus of some of the most corrosive federal policy in the history of this nation. He was a statist, and his New Deal vision kicked off a government-growing, deficit-ballooning spending binge on inefficient and ineffective state programs that have turned the federal government into a bloodsucking behemoth, and many of her citizens into baby birds with their necks out and their mouths agape as they sit in the nest of asking not what their country can do for them, but what their country *must* do for them or else. Franklin Roosevelt, LOL!
1 - 10 Next
Sunday, June 03 | 10:57 AM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 10:57 AM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 10:57 AM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 10:57 AM ET