In response to:

It's Come to This: Sandra Fluke Nominated for Person of the Year

MikeinBelize Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 12:25 PM
Miss Fluck is perfect as the embodiment of the marxists: a homely "student" in her 30's who reportedly has never earned an honest dime in her life, so desperate for validation that she affects a mis-spelling/mispronounciation of her name (to better stand out in the crowd of fellow travelers don't you know). Rush is right - we don't just have to defeat these termites we have to crush them once and for all.
Henry VIII Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 12:32 PM
I am not sure that validation is all she seeks, she has managed to get her education payed for by others, and she wants a seat at the Big Government table....this was her Entree Act.

Apparently in the year 2012 all you have to do to become nominated as TIME's Person of Year is throw away your dignity and beg your neighbors in front of Congress to pay for your sex life as a 30-year-old adult child. TIME asks readers, should Sandra Fluke be chosen as Person of the Year? Definitely? No way? Below is TIME's description:

As always, TIME's editors will choose the Person of the Year, but that doesn't mean readers shouldn't have their say. Cast your vote for the person you think most influenced the news this year...