My how the worm has turned. The government has a long history of bombing whomever they want without indictment. Liberals and 3rd world countries have made this complaint often; and it has usually been denounced by conservatives. This is moral relativity on your part; which ironically, is also said to be a liberal trait.

Vic: Draw it for me Vic. Because I really don’t see one.

Hey, nice way to connect this to Obama. So, you had your own country. What was it called and how did you lose it?

Brain: Whew! I am so glad you wrote that. Can you imagine; the ten worst bombings in America and not having all of them blamed on or related to Obama? But Hawkins isn’t a liberal. If he were, he would have blamed them all on Bush. And of course attempted bombings should count. Why should the term “worst” have any meaning when trying to show how bad liberals are?

chips: “You never heard that God is not made in your image and plays to your imagination” Well certainly not in my image or imagination, but I’m not so sure about a lot of folks around here. It seems a little too convenient that God always agrees with their politics. You never hear of anyone struggling to follow God’s Ways when it comes to contemporary issues.

Ok, this one is tough to comment on because it is just so funny. Dr. Adams had me laughing in the first paragraph and I couldn’t stop chucking the whole way through. Dr. Adams is undeniably a talented writer with a flair for satire. That being said, what can we glean other than some college students can be silly in what they think and how they behave? Well, that’s not really a big issue and it is a feeble attempt to fan the anti-college emotions of Dr. Adams’ primary audience. But does that matter? When he says that “most Americans are not Swift enough to appreciate social satire”, he means all of us too. There’s a joke buried in there somewhere; keep buying his product and it may surface.

Anom: No, you wrote, “Excessive hormones (which is what most of these contraceptives are) can be just as dangerous as meth”. “Just as” means the same. In this case it is referring to danger. And that has been thoroughly refuted in this sub thread in the simplest of terms. You are losing your grip now, buddy. So let’s say you are right and so is everyone who agrees with you. The FDA, NIH, BoP and I are all wrong. Now you can sit back and enjoy that you enlightened another poor soul.

Anom: So what was the point of you writing “Also, I said that your position (the one that rejects the possibility of harmful consequences as a result of unnecessary hormonal drugs) is short-sighted. So much for comprehension”?

Anom: And one again, yes, both are still bad, but not the same. You do realize that the words you wrote earlier are still available to review? I like the skull comment, But what I get is that you twist and quibble and stretch your argument. You throw modern pharmacology to the wind on the basis of 1940s scientific flaws. You just won’t own up to anything. You oppose abortion, I get it. As I said before, I won’t oppose that or tell you that you’re wrong; but when someone becomes as grasping in their argument as you do, it give me the impression that you seek justification.

Anom: And yes, I’m not just inferring, I’m saying out right about the hypocrisy and science; but that refer only to when I choose to comment not all things I oppose. So your counter charge of hypocrisy is still wrong. I wrote “You even called me short sighted for dismissing the science you offered” based on your statement “It has long been known that irregular amounts of hormones can trigger and accelerate the growth of various cancer cells - yet, you and your short-sighted position somehow dismiss this common knowledge” You see that word dismiss that you wrote? My comprehension is completely accurate.

Anom: “For the same reason you offer science as support for your position.” No, I offer it because I believe in its soundless. That is the opposite of your position. “Excessive hormones (which is what most of these contraceptives are) can be just as dangerous as meth” That is the outrageous statement with the key factor being that you understand what “just as dangerous” mean. It means equal. Your most recent attempts have been to back-peddle from that.