The event was a commemoration of the historic March on Selma during the civil rights movement. It was attended by many other politicians (including the Clintons) and at least 10,000 people. Obama did not directly associate with any Black Panthers at the event. Very pertinent facts intentionally omitted from the piece above. With that knowledge and perspective in mind only racists would condemn Obama for attending an event commemorating the civil rights movement . Only race baiters like Breitbart would so deceptively twist the truth just to fester racial animosity.

No guessing involved to say it's a slap in the face to Fox News because there's no other possible conclusion.

So Fox News is paying Sarah huge bucks to be on FN because, as Roger Ailes (head of Fox News) put it in an interview released yesterday, she's " hot and gets ratings". But she makes her inevitable announcement on Mark Levin not Fox. Guess for some reason she didn't appreciate Ailes' comment..

TrollSlayer- When The Supreme Court declared in Lawrence v. Texas that laws prohibiting sexual acts between same sex couples were unconstitutional they threw out the legal notion that same sex was like molesting children or humping dogs in public and such. That opened the door for legitimizing same sex marriage. I agree with your statement: "So why don't we let SCOTUS settle it?"

Truncheon (5:46 PM): "Every American has an equal right to marriage, under the law. You have precisely the same rights that I do, under precisely the same conditions." What insane laughable nonsense: Gays don't have the same marriage conditions as straights -- Marrying someone they love as a partner they want to spend their life with. Marrying someone they want to have sex with. The Supreme Court rulings covering marriage as a Constitutional right inherently includes those conditions/rights I brought up and are nondetachable from why marriage is a Constitutional right- "pursuit of happiness" See my response below Truncheon's(5:06).

Truncheon: "Nobody has those rights." Ah, the old deny reality, my twisted mind will redefine a universally accepted definition of "right" to suit my purpose. Tell any straight person, besides Truncheon, they don't have the rights I pointed out and they'll look at you like you're bonkers, and rightfully so. The unavoidable ever growing trend of Americans believing that gays have the Constitutional right to pursue happiness will overcome and roll over the prejudice and bigotry of people like Truncheon. Truncheon: "Everyone marries under precisely the same conditions.." The major parts of those conditions for the vast majority of Americans are marrying someone they want to spend their lives with and that they want to have sex...

Truncheon: "Gay (sic) have precisely the same marriage rights as everyone else in America." Perhaps Truncheon can explain how gays have these marriage rights: The right to marry a partner they want to spend their lives with. The right to marry someone they want to have sex with. No doubt the explanation involves a nonsensical non-relevant claim that I'm an idiot.

With egg all over my face I apologize for misreading OBL as Obama. Change last sentence to: "Aegius has absolutely no idea what he's talking about when talking about me."

My comment was strictly limited to Meinecke's intentional omission of Bush's souffle and the reason she ommitted it. I gave credit to Bush in a previous comment on TH. The idea Obama is a Hitler is as ludicrous as the idea Bush is a Hitler. Evidently "Aegius" means "Someone who has absolutely no idea what they're talking about."

"I was eating souffle at Rise Restaurant with Laura and two buddies," - Bush's sentence before ""I excused myself and went home to take the call," Isn't Meinecke the clever propagandist? Can't have Bush appear elitist to the TH sheeple.