In response to:

Man Who Shot Up Family Research Council: I Wanted to Kill as Many as Possible and Smear Chick-fil-A in Their Faces

Mike14760 Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 8:49 AM
The supream court also ruled that weapons that are useful for military use are the weapons that are protected in Miller V US.
Luscious Lars Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 9:00 AM
In a round about way, yes, that is what they basically stated. If you read the decision with an open mind, it would be hard to argue the opposite.

Yesterday 28-year-old Floyd Lee Corkins II, the man who attempted to kill members of the conservative Family Research Council in Washington D.C. in August 2012, plead guilty to three charges including committing an act of terrorism.

The question since August has been: Why did Corkins choose FRC as his target? After all, he was a gay activist who bizarrely walked into the FRC offices with a Chik-fil-A bag in one hand and a gun in the other before he opened fire, shooting a security guard who luckily survived his injuries.

According to an...