Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Progressives and the Unnecessary Lie

michigander4 Wrote: Jun 15, 2014 7:35 AM
Yeah, Nixon lost 17 minutes of tape recordings and it was a Front Page Story and leading the nightly news for weeks. But Lois Lerner loses two years of emails and all we hear is crickets chirping.
In response to:

Progressives and the Unnecessary Lie

michigander4 Wrote: Jun 15, 2014 7:27 AM
RE: " Or are they just so used to getting away with it that they throw caution to the wind knowing they will ultimately be given a pass because they have the media in their back pocket?" That captures it nicely, Derek.
re: "No, it's a "you're a hypocrite" argument, and it's perfectly applicable." PULEEZE don't get me started on hypocrisy. Look up the word in the dictionary and you will find Obama's picture. My favorite example is his rant on the 2008 campaign trail about George Bush's high gasoline prices, which are now double what they were in Bush's last month in office.
Dredging up Iraq to justify missteps surrounding Benghazi is the old "two-wrongs-make-a-right" defense, never mind the fact that every major Democrat in congress signed on to the invasion of Iraq...... and, RE: "But there would have been no reason for the Administration to have NOT saved these people deliberately." Of course there was a reason not to save them -- it would have required admitting who they were being saved FROM, ie, TERRORISTS.
What I want to know is why gays get preferential treatment in the armed services. This, of course, is another politically incorrect question to ask, but I'm going to ask it anyway -- If gay male soldiers are permitted to enter the male shower room to gaze upon the naked objects of their admitted sexual preference, why are straight male soldiers not permitted to enter the female shower room to gaze upon the naked objects of their admitted sexual preference? I have never been able to get a satisfactory answer to this question. Every response is either a long tap dance around the question or a screeching hissy fit accusing me of being a bigoted homophobe. But, never an answer to the question. Why? Because there is no plausible answer. I defy anyone to answer the question. Any takers? No hissy fits. No tap dances. Just an honest answer.
If you really want to drive liberal Walmart-Haters crazy, just ask them the following question: What would the 1,400,000 American Walmart employees be doing for a living if Walmart did not exist?
In response to:

Hillary Versus the Truth on Benghazi

michigander4 Wrote: Jun 04, 2014 10:53 AM
RE: You're "hoping" people will get off their behinds, etc., etc. Good luck with your "Hope and Change." (LOL)
In response to:

Hillary Versus the Truth on Benghazi

michigander4 Wrote: Jun 04, 2014 9:46 AM
Resign yourself to it -- Hillary will be your next president. She will be elected by the same morons who elected Obama TWICE! Stand in front of any supermarket and ask the first 20 people coming out the door if Hillary was responsible for the Benghazi incident. One will say, "Yes;" one will say, "No" and 18 will say, "Ben who?"
Tinsldr2: For 2000 years the definition of marriage – at least in the Christian world – has been the joining of one man and one woman. When our country was founded on Christian-Judeo principles, the definition of marriage remained the same. The definition has not gradually changed over time as you profess. You can attempt muddying the waters by talking about age of consent, no-fault divorce, illegal polygamy, etc., etc., but none of that has anything to do with the fundamental, age-old concept of “one man – one woman.” The left has played the, “Laws-gradually-change-with-the-times” game with the Constitution for a long time, and it’s no surprise that they are now attempting to apply the same bogus theory to the definition of marriage. It doesn’t fly with the Constitution and it doesn’t fly with marriage.
Don't get me started.... How about the left's insistence that women "deserve" to be placed in combat units in the armed services.I can hear the outcry now when the killed and wounded start stacking up. "Gosh, we didn't know you could really get hurt in combat."
I agree. Same sex couples should have all the same rights and privileges as a married man and woman, but they have no right to hijack the term, "Marriage."
Previous 21 - 30 Next