1 - 10 Next
Nixon had to resign because there was a Democrat majority in the senate which would have convicted him in an impeachment trial. Today there is also a Democrat majority in the senate, but Obama wouldn't be convicted by them if he were an axe murderer. As I've said all along, Obama will suffer a few nicks, scrapes & bruises from these scandals, but in the final analysis he'll get off the hook. Very sad.
In response to:

Hillary Needs a Benghazi Necklace

michigander4 Wrote: May 19, 2013 7:52 AM
Anyone who was paying attention knew we were being lied to by October, 2012. The same slugs who were not paying attention then are not paying attention now. Obama and Hillary will end up with a few nicks, scrapes & bruises over Benghazi, but they will ultimately get off the hook. Sad!
Help me out fellas, I'm just an old country boy trying to figure this out. I was always taught that in order to enter the Kingdom of Heaven (to be Saved) one must embrace Christ as Saviour and the Son of God. Where does that leave our Jewish bretheren?
RE: "You can’t have a spokesman who is known to have lied. They need to go soon." All I can say is Jay Carney must spend a lot of time in front of the mirror practicing keeping a straight face.
If beating up on Romney makes you feel better, go for it. As for me, I ask myself would a President Romney have lied about Benghazi? Would a President Romney have sent military help to rescue the Americans at Benghazi? For that matter, what do you think a President George W. Bush would have done about Benghazi under the same circumstances? There's no doubt in my mind how either of them would have handled the situation..... they would have pulled out all the stops to rescue our personnel at Benghazi.
Dudley, you nailed it. Stand outside a supermarket and ask the first ten people coming through the door what they think about Benghazi. Nine of them will say, "Ben who?"
We all should get on our knees and thank the reporters at FoxNews. They refused to let the Benghazi story die on the vine. Yes, Bob Schieffer and other MSM reporters are finally (and reluctantly) getting on board, but only after their eight months of silence became an embarrassment to them. If the MSM wants to totally redeem itself for its lack of focus on Benghazi it should do thorough investigations of Fast & Furious and the IRS targetting of conservative groups.
In response to:

Journalists Must Be Bulldogs

michigander4 Wrote: May 13, 2013 8:46 AM
Sharyl Attkisson should be commended to be sure, but we all should get on our knees and thank the reporters at FoxNews. They refused to let the Benghazi story die on the vine. Yes, Bob Schieffer and other MSM reporters are finally (and reluctantly) getting on board, but only after their eight months of silence became an embarrassment to them. If the MSM wants to redeem itself for Benghazi it should do a thorough investigation of Fast and Furious.
In response to:

Benghazi for Dummies

michigander4 Wrote: May 12, 2013 8:20 AM
RE: "Until the Democrats come clean with the truth, the conspiracies will continue to germinate." Which Democrats? Run-of-the-mill Democrats don't know the truth any more than the rest of us. There's only a handful of Democrats who know the truth, the two big ones being Hilary and Obama...... and they will continue to ride it out with stonewalling and lies.
Geraldo was on O'Reilly last night, grudgingly admitting Obama's culpability in covering up the Benghazi affair. But when O'Reilly asked him if it rose to the seriousness of Watergate, Geraldo said, "No." How can that be? Nixon tried to cover up a botched burglary in which no one was killed. Obama tried to cover up the fact that he and his subordinates refused to send help to Benghazi, resulting in the murder of four Americans. Which attempted coverup was the most egregious? You be the judge.
1 - 10 Next
Wednesday, May 22 | 02:32 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 02:32 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 02:32 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 02:32 AM ET