1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Lies About Libya

Michele12 Wrote: May 14, 2013 11:56 PM
No one is mentioning the film maker who was arrested on possible probation violation. Of course, we have to assume that this arrest was spearheaded by Obama and company because they wanted the visual of his arrest to confirm and buttress their video story. Yes, the guy was a jerk but there are a lot of jerks in LA who have probation violations - are they being led in front of a camera in handcuffs at the behest of the President of the United States. Was this an abuse of power to have the White House spearhead an arrest to cover their lies.
We are affording legal protections to the natural habitats of animals all the time. These animals can often to survive in other environments but the 'simplistic' environmental movement (which I am sure you both hardily approve) believes that these animals best survive in their natural habitat. Why not afford human children the same protections. Oh I forgot ,people like you don't believe in affording them any protection in the wombs of their mothers so why would you want to provide any protections for their natural habitat after they are born.
We are affording legal protections to the natural habitats of animals all the time. These animals can often to survive in other environments but the 'simplistic' environmental movement (which I am sure you both hardily approve) believes that these animals best survive in their natural habitat. Why not afford human children the same protections. Oh I forgot ,people like you don't believe in affording them any protection in the wombs of their mothers so why would you want to provide any protections for their natural habitat after they are born.
We are affording legal protections to the natural habitats of animals all the time. These animals can often to survive in other environments but the 'simplistic' environmental movement (which I am sure you both hardily approve) believes that these animals best survive in their natural habitat. Why not afford human children the same protections. Oh I forgot ,people like you don't believe in affording them any protection in the wombs of their mothers so why would you want to provide any protections for their natural habitat after they are born.
We are affording legal protections to the natural habitats of animals all the time. These animals can often to survive in other environments but the 'simplistic' environmental movement (which I am sure you both hardily approve) believes that these animals best survive in their natural habitat. Why not afford human children the same protections. Oh I forgot ,people like you don't believe in affording them any protection in the wombs of their mothers so why would you want to provide any protections for their natural habitat after they are born.
I think that nature has led the way here. Children are the natural outcome of the love between a man and a woman. If you believe in God, you assume he made it that way. I would think that even a non-religious environmentalist so anxious to preserve the natural order of things would have pause (if they were consistent). The natural habitat of children is in the care of a man and a woman. Why would they be so against destroying the natural habitat of an animal but not think to preserve the natural habitat of a child? This would also take into account why adoptive children are best placed in the home of a man and a woman.
In response to:

Confessions of a Bad Woman

Michele12 Wrote: Jan 11, 2013 12:43 AM
I agree with you. As a conservative person and practicing Catholic - I don't really root for women or 'Catholics' as such. After all I could never root for a Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden (and I personally believe that they are not really Catholics). I do care about people in general - I always root for the person (man or woman) whom I think will help bring sanity into a crumbling world. I also agree with all 3 points you made at the end of your article and if that makes me a bad woman so be it.
In response to:

Unfit to Govern

Michele12 Wrote: Aug 14, 2012 7:15 AM
You should make sure your mother no longer votes. In the last election, I heard a story on the news about a Democrat operative who went into a nursing home and helped some of the residents fill out absentee ballots. This was exposed by someone who found out that their mother with dementia had been one who had been given this kindly 'help' to vote.
In response to:

Conservatives and the Court

Michele12 Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 2:23 PM
Just saw my 3rd or 4th ad paid for by our taxpayer dollars about how great the health care bill is and how happy I should be with all my new benefits. Guess Obama just figured out how to raise an extra billion or 2 for his election campaign. Paid for by our taxes!!!! Thanks to this great ruling. Just when we were hoping Obama would lag in election donations - he found a way to take everyone's money to get re-elected.
What you don't understand is that we really are concerned about Chen. We really want him to come to America where he won't be tortured and his wife and 2 children will be allowed to live. He is a brave and good man who has suffered so much. If Obama and Hilary get the credit then that is there due. i don't want Obama reelected but that doesn't mean I don't want good done for this man and his family. Perhaps Democrats were upset when Bush did something good and got the credit - well don't paint everyone with that brush. That being said - i think the student visa thing is a sham (face saving). But I hope I am wrong.
1 - 10 Next