In response to:

Why We Are Losing Debate Over Same-Sex Marriage

Michael3783 Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 4:42 PM
Marriage wasn't created for the loving couple - it was created to provide a lasting sustainable foundation to raise children. How else to explain laws against incest, bigamy and polygamy? Should incest laws apply to SSM's? How about requiring blood tests?Those do not apply to SSM's but make a world of difference for traditional couples.
FlamingLiberalMultiCulturalist Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 6:22 PM
Gee, we've never even gotten to the point of considering such practical questions. I guess so?

Same-sex marriage is probably inevitable in America whatever the Supreme Court decides. That's because the public is clearly leaning that way. That the court is even being asked to impose a sweeping social change on the nation is illustrative of another lost battle -- the idea that the Supreme Court is not a super-legislature and that nine robed lawyers ought to refrain from imposing their policy preferences on the whole nation.

Even two liberal justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, have from time to time expressed caution about the Court imposing its will on matters better left up to the...