1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Answering Ted Olson

Michael3783 Wrote: Oct 14, 2014 3:13 PM
I could ask Mr. Olson a question, I'd ask whether he believes laws prohibiting incest, or laws requiring a blood test for a marriage license are invalid. After all, they have no purpose in a gay relationship. Some people have such problems with the scientific event of "conception". For pro-abortionists, it is essentially like catching a cold. It confers no rights or personhood on the unique, newly formed fetus (who I believe is endowed by its Creator with an inalienable right to life). And they seem to resist the simple (scientific!) observation that conception can ONLY occur with one sperm (from a man) and one egg (from a woman). Which makes that association DIFFERENT. (Not being judgmental - just factual). Why should the law deny such a simple, yet profound distinction?
In response to:

Rocking the Vote to the Left

Michael3783 Wrote: Oct 10, 2014 3:45 PM
Isn't the term "reproductive rights" a misnomer? After all, despite the obvious wisdom in some cases (Lena?), who is stopping anyone from reproducing? Does she mean the right NOT to reproduce? While I would encourage her diligence on that point, that is easily accomplished, and no one (myself, especially) is forcing Lena Dunham to reproduce. So I guess that leaves her simply to support "Sex Without Cost or Consequences" - and I would suggest that cause be led by State Department Advisor on Global Women's Issues, Jonathan Dach.
In response to:

Tuition Pays for This

Michael3783 Wrote: Aug 20, 2014 12:15 PM
The current issue du jour for Mr. Obama and liberals is making college "more affordable". But all they're doing is proposing more subsidies for more student loans. It's like Lexus saying they're reducing the cost of their cars by offering interest-free loans. If they really wanted to make college more affordable, they'd find ways to publicize and prohibit colleges receiving public funds from, say, paying a $300,000 speaking fee to a politician with whom they want to curry favor. Face it, the reason college tuition has exceeded the general rate of inflation for over 30 years is that colleges feel no pressure from tuition hikes, since the increases are funded by grants and loans provided by the government. And what liberals offer is more of the same, funding the left-wing academic aristocracy with its cash cow.
In response to:

Do Blacks Need Favors?

Michael3783 Wrote: Jul 23, 2014 10:46 AM
The soft bigotry of low expectations.
Remember when FBI Director Mueller didn't even know who the lead agent was? The DOJ and FBI really took POTUS insistence that they get to the bottom of this "inexcusable" behavior very seriously!
So based on the polling, MORE people are racist now than in 2008, or even 2012? The worse O & Ho do, the more racist people are, I guess.
In response to:

Democrats Don't Debate; They Distort

Michael3783 Wrote: Jun 24, 2014 11:14 AM
And what about Korea?
In response to:

Democrats Don't Debate; They Distort

Michael3783 Wrote: Jun 24, 2014 11:11 AM
It was Joe Biden who predicted that Iraq would be one of the "great achievements" of the Obama Administration. Why would he have said something like that? How long have our troops been in Korea, delaying that civil war? And what has happened in Libya after Khadafy was removed (and we abandoned those folks)?
In response to:

Democrats Don't Debate; They Distort

Michael3783 Wrote: Jun 24, 2014 11:02 AM
After Gallipoli, how could anyone believe Churchill when he warned of a "gathering storm"? And ... history repeats???
The beatings will continue until morale improves and every agent signs an agreement supporting the president 100%, and agreeing not to disclose anything that would contradict the liberal Democrat narrative that Obama has already sealed the borders.
1 - 10 Next