In response to:

Michigan Unions: Why Help Workers When We Can Help Ourselves?

Michael3116 Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 3:41 PM
I would disagree on that one. At one point in our history they provided a hand to the working man to prevent unsafe working conditions, reasonable work hours and a better rate of pay. The problem is that during the 30's unions became a racket run by the likes of the mafia dons. This meant they stopped working for their members and started looting their members. Loans made from pension funds to launder money with out repaying the loans, etc... now they are little more than criminal organizations trying to keep their cash cows (members) in the pasture available for slaughter any time they feel the need.
Steve1579 Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 5:29 PM
I agree. There was a time that they were very much needed. My wife had to join the nurses Union in Califonia when she started work in tghe San Diego area..when a problem arose between her and her employer, the union, which had taken a feww months dues from her, refused to step in and elp her, because she had not been a mem ber long enough to ive them a lot of dues money.Pretty well proved what their priorities were. The Hospital eventually went under after my wife left their employment.

Following Michigan's adoption of Right to Work legislation, unions, it seems, have decided that their best chance for self-preservation is a good offense...against their own members. The Wall Street Journal reports on a memo revealing that the unions' strategy for combating the law -- which will undoubtedly cost them precious funds, as already-reluctant members opt to quit -- is to target remaining members as they attempt to minimize loss of influence.

That's the message from a December 27-28 memo to local union presidents and board members from Michigan Education Association President Steven Cook, which recommends tactics that unions can...

Saturday, May 18 | 08:22 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 08:22 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 08:22 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 08:22 PM ET