1 - 10 Next
Nah, let em destroy what they can President Obama could then do some real work by fixing it.
Actually it's very simple the mainstream media and our current president are implementing a process known as grinding the middle class between the wheel of taxation and the grist of inflation. You destroy the currency making it worthless and tax the daylights out of the middle class making them poor so you can rule them instead of govern.
I'm with Rob on this one. Besides what standing does a teacher's union have to sue walmart over a foreign policy question? And does this open the union up for a counter suit on the grounds of harassment?
Why don't you try using the Koran after all in that religion being gay is a death by public stoning offense.
HAHAHAHA, OMG thanks I needed this bit of comedy this morning. I truly hope you and your ilk believe what you've written. Let's see among Obama's accomplishments, he snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Increased the deficit by 5,000,000,000,000,000 which translates thus far into nearly 21 trillion in actual debt. He's gone from making a about 200k per year as a senator with a net worth of about 900,000 to being worth 40 million (ever wonder how a sitting president making 400k per year increases his net work by 400%). He's intentionally put both light and heavy weapons in the hands of the most violent criminals on this content and is now responsible for civilian and police on both sides of the border.
In response to:

The Right Running Mate

Michael3116 Wrote: Apr 26, 2012 4:04 PM
He doesn't seem particularly liberal to me. He's listed out a good chunk of the top contenders for the VP spot with their strengths and flaws as gauged against the most recent holders of the office. Sadly, Quayle was horribly savaged in the press mostly with manufactured issues. And while Bush Sr. didn't get savaged quite as badly during his term as VP he was a solid consistent trooper for Pres for the reasons he listed out. He wasn't the best president in that Woods out maneuvered him in to raising taxes but he wasn't a disaster like Carter or this current Goof.
In response to:

Sarah Palin Slams Michelle Obama

Michael3116 Wrote: Apr 25, 2012 6:42 PM
Might be an interesting match up but I'd bet on Mrs. Palin after all she's actually gone out into the wilds and brought home the meat as well as the hide (still attached to the meat). And Michelle has only paid other people to do dirty work for her. So in a donnie brook I'd bet on the one who's dealt with bloody business over the one that orders take out.
Our leaders were never perfect but at least we knew where they stood and we didn't have them waiting until their second term to "be more flexible" because it's their last election. The fact is the progressive try to assume power by deception which pretty much tells me their agenda isn't in the interests of the US or it's citizens or they wouldn't feel the need to be "more flexible".
I would suggest Progressive prefer illegal immigrants to legal immigrants because illegal immigrants are easier to control after all if they get out of line you just deport the illegal immigrants. When you add to the situation voting laws that allow progressive to pad the voter rolls with illegal immigrants, the dead and other fictional "citizens" you get a voting scam where a relatively small number of power mad lunatics and their useful idiots can take control of the government for at least short periods of time.
In response to:

Cost to Discuss War on Women? $75,800

Michael3116 Wrote: Apr 23, 2012 3:05 PM
Sadly, to progressives truth doesn't mean anything when it conflicts with ideological objectives. In fact, the poor souls are frequently so deluded they believe the fecal material being spewed by their leaders.
1 - 10 Next