In response to:

Marriage Best Left to Churches

Michael2502 Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 9:32 PM
The problem with keeping the state out of marriage is that this only trivializes marriage further. Any couple with a "civil union license" would simply call themselves married, even though marriage as traditionally understood has always, even in cultures where homosexuality was accepted, been understood to be the union of a man and a woman, since that's the kind of relationship that (1) reflects the sexual duality of and represents in a microcosm the whole human race, and (2) is the only kind that naturally creates new human beings. The term "marriage" would become nothing more than a distinction without a difference -- i.e, it would be redefined anyway, by virtue of its having no official definition.

The current conundrum regarding the legalization of same-sex marriage is what happens when church and state are mixed -- the topics become confusing and confused.

When I married my husband almost 15 years ago, I did so out of love and out of a desire to witness before God my commitment to him and his to me. The legal and tax ramifications did not enter into my head.

But for couples of the same sex, the legal and tax ramifications can be very important because their legal rights differ from those of heterosexual couples in a number of ways,...

Sunday, May 19 | 06:12 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 06:12 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 06:12 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 06:12 PM ET