Check out Russia or Africa to see how the socialist and "collective" thought of feminism is turning out in society. Being left to "fend for themselves" women have little or no support from men. These amazon societies leave children to fend for themselves, after men gladly donate their creative juices and then head off to support their own selfish desires. Women become hopeless, because they just can't do it all. The biggest difference is that in Russia, children aren't being born at a rate sufficient to replace the population, while in Africa, the birth rate produces increasing opportunities for poverty. Men and women are different, but are meant to act as partners. Children deserve to have both a mother and a father.

Excellent article. Well made points. However, I do not believe that these truths apply only to people of color. I believe that the concluding paragraph of this article should and does apply to all people, regardless of race, economic background, religion or creed. We need to revisit our priorities and establish the family as the building block of society and eliminate selfishness to the best of our abilities.

My son brought his textbook for his college "health" class. I got educated. I had now idea how things have changed over the past 30 years. The subjects on human sexuality that may have been covered in several paragraphs now need 10% of the entire book. I am certain that my son is now familiar with sexual practices that he wishes that he had never heard of. And we are in Utah, where I am confident that people feel is less likely to see such advocacy of deviance - being advocated as "normal." Not to mention the advocacy, together with this fecal matter in print, of the need to be "green" in every aspect of your life. It is no wonder that we are seeing an increase in animalistic behavior when such subjects are addressed as such.

The Liberal/Progressive agenda has always been to reduce the population of the "inferior" and less "intellectual" people. Think about it. What bothers liberals and progressives more than anything is having the "stupid" people using up all of the resources that they believe that they - as the superior and right-thinking people - are entitled to. Of course, in order to convince the "inferiors" to go along with the plan, lets lay the path to the ginger bread house with pieces of candy - it gets those inferior thinkers every time. Get rid of all those inferiors and the "superiors" can live in wonderful harmony with the polar bears, the whales and the mice.

Capt-Call. You are uninformed on this issue. Mosiah 3:19 (Book of Mormon) "For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father."

AGREED. Talk about a smear campaign! The smear is going both ways because people are buying into MSM. Conservatives are falling for it. They believe what George Soros says, rather than listen to what the candidates have said. There isn't really much difference in the positions of each of the candidates - that is why they have resorted to hyperbole, rather than being able to compare and contrast their positions. These debates are doing nothing to bring out the contrasting of positions. It has become "reality tv" where manufactured drama rules the day and determines the "winner" of the debate.

Is ignorance of facts truly blissful? Would you trust anything that Soros says? Romney is not at war with the Tea Party. Look at the positions. Can you honestly get past the rhetoric and then say that Romney's positions on the issues are truly different than any other Republican candidate. Other than the pandering of Newt, can you honestly say that Newt is aligned with the conservative base of the party? Come on, listen to reality. Get out of the bigot jar.

And here lies the elephant in the room. This explains South Carolina best. Those that think there is a hair's width of difference in the philosophical differences of political governance between Mitt, Newt and Rick are believing what someone else is telling them, rather than looking rationally at their stated positions. Newt has done much more smearing than Romney could possibly do. The innuendo of Mormonism is behind this article, as well as those that are endorsing Newt with no substantive facts to distinguish their political positions. Such innuendo stinks to high heaven and is as bigoted as any Jim Crow attitude.

It was 2 budgets, not 4. Newt deserves some credit, but the world was not created by Newt ... something he would like you to believe.

Look at the math - revenues ALWAYS go up when rates go down. Get your head out of the percentage rate toilet.