1 - 10 Next
That is one reason why we need to stop using their terminology ever. Stop using the term "gay" when referring to homosexuals! They are "homosexuals," "lesbians," "sexual deviants," "sexually immoral," but "gay" they are not. As soon as you condescend to use "their" terminology, you've already lost the debate. It is well know that whoever defines the terms, wins the debate. So stop referring to them by their choice of terms because their choices of terms will be those terms that portray them in a sympathetic light instead of as they are. By gaining unwarranted sympathy from the uninformed masses, they easily proceed to then shut out any argument against their chosen lifestyle as being "unenlightened," "homophobic," (another fictitious word), "hate," "prejudice," etc. Once we are presented in those terms and they in sympathetic, "we're the victims here" terms, it's over.
In response to:

PC and the NBA

Michael1957MN Wrote: May 03, 2013 2:00 AM
"They [ESPN] regret a "respectful discussion" occurred? Like many media companies, ESPN has made "respectful debate" and "diversity" into antonyms. "Diversity" doesn't mean "diversity of opinions." It means the tyranny of forced agreement or forced silence." It's never been about "tolerance" but forced acceptance and approval.
In response to:

Junk Laws

Michael1957MN Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 3:08 AM
Back around the turn of the century (late 1800 or early 1900's) the joke was: A man is heard complaining in a pub, "The Democrats call the Republicans "a bunch of crooks" and the Republicans call the Democrats "a bunch of crooks" but the problem is, they're both right."
In response to:

Junk Laws

Michael1957MN Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 3:05 AM
Reagan writes, " Nancy Pelosi’s career quote is going to be her comment on the healthcare bill, “But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it.” " And despite something so incredibly STUPID, the equally stupid, or lazy, or bought, American public voted her into office yet again, even after that remark (among many other stupid, unAmerican things she has said).
Considering that this is the same moron who boasted about how his energy plan would of necessity cause energy costs to rise and bankrupt an entire (coal) industry; is it really that surprising that he would deliberately lead the nation into another recession? Of course not! He hates the idea of a strong, independent, free America, he and his wife Moochele are two of a kind, and as I can't be sure that there won't be any kids reading this, I can't say what kind that is, but you adults know what I mean.
Daniel, you write, "call me crazy -- I don’t think the election was outright stolen," which begs the question, do we have our head in the sand?
In response to:

Facing the Giants

Michael1957MN Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 3:35 AM
As I asked the other individual above, this has WHAT to do with the article by Mr. Adams?
In response to:

Facing the Giants

Michael1957MN Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 3:33 AM
And this has WHAT to do with the article by Mr. Adams?
In response to:

Libya and Lies

Michael1957MN Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 6:23 AM
Sowell writes in part, "After bin Laden was located, why would any President not give the go-ahead to get him? That took no courage at all. It would have been far more dangerous politically for Obama not to have given the go-ahead. " Actually, as it turns out, Obummer wasn't the one to give the order. He was playing golf and didn't find out till after the fact. Apparently, obummer had denied authorization to take the hit 3 times before then, his staff finally just going for it on their own.
Kengor concludes with the following paragraph and it's pointed question: Why isn’t the media talking about the homeless under President Obama [The way they Constantly asked/hounded President Reagan about the 50% lower numbers in during his presidency]? Why aren’t liberals? Do they suddenly no longer care about the homeless? Or are the homeless merely a convenient political tool, to be ignored or exploited depending on whose party is up for re-election?" Why? Because for them it IS just a "convenient political tool." That and anything that reflects poorly on their messiah is to be ignored if possible, downplayed if not.
1 - 10 Next