Above the photo--where you have the options to "forward", "print", "share", and "single page"--if you select "print" it'll format the page so that it is ready to print. In this format you can see the entire chart.

If you're referring to "Overblown", yes, I do get it. I know that they hope to apply it to humans someday. The gene therapy they're describing doesn't involve foreign DNA, like a modified retrovirus, it's just another person's mitochondrial DNA. The genetic armageddon sensationalism in his article is ridiculous, as are the predictable attempts to equate it to designer babies and demonize the whole thing because fallen people may or may not hope to use it someday for vain purposes if it's even possible to do so. The moral and ethical consequences need to be raised, but I bet hopeful parents carrying these disease genes believe God has blessed us with this technology and its important to recognize its compassionate use and not paint the...

A healthy female monkey donates an unfertilized egg that has mtDNA without the defective genes. The nucleus is removed from this unfertilized egg and replaced with the nucleus of a fertilized egg that had mitochondria with defective genes. Normally children inherit also inherit the mitochondria and its DNA from their mother. To spare them from a genetic disease, they have been given the mitochondria of a donor, instead.

That sounds pretty noble to me.

Yet, Ken sounds the alarm that we have to question whether or not this could "irrevocably alter the human species."

What? Ken, do you think they're planning on using monkey eggs as the mitochondrial DNA donor for human embryos?

Keep in mind that the donated...

Moore probably considers his work to be art that ought to be funded the same way that the National Endowment of Arts grants funding to artists that produce "art" that wouldn't otherwise be supported by the public.

He has no appreciation for the fact that investors willing to risk their capital to produce and promote a blockbuster hit, and doing so successfully, is what allows those same studio execs to take a risk on his potential dud that people may not care to see. I wonder if he thinks that the directors of "Glitter," "Ishtar," or "Battlefield:Earth" were entitled to have their films made. The NEA mentality would fund a sequel, the capitalist mentality would pass.

I disagree with Medved's statement that Obama is being dragged to the extreme left by ultra-liberals. Dragged would imply some level of unwillingness and resistance on his part. If they're telling him where to stand, he's following their direction without much public protest. In contrast, if the GOP gained back control of the House in 2010, then I would say it was fitting to describe him as being dragged back towards the center, though always to the left of it.