President Obama and Governor Romney battled to a draw on foreign policy points tonight, with each candidate scoring on several lines. As expected, the discussion meandered into domestic policy for a large portion of the evening, and both men came prepared with a flurry of talking points. Romney needed to strike casual viewers are informed, poised, and plausible as president. He accomplished that task, without question. The president often seemed like the aggressor, hammering his challenger in almost every answer he gave. Romney coolly chided Obama, explaining that attacking him (especially dishonestly) doesn't advance any solutions. The candidates found themselves...
In response to:
In answer to: AskGermaine wrote: "So, like in the 2nd debate, Romney can be embarassed by having the facts wrong. All he had to do was read the rose garden transcript himself. " Really AG? You can backtrack like Candy Crowely did after the debate. To sum it up for you, when Obama was speaking in the rose garden he described what happened to our ambassador and 3 others as "a shocking attack", "brutal attack", and a "terrible act". He said we reject efforts to denigrate others religous beliefs (a reference to the video He called the people responsible "killers", "attackers". When he spoke of 9/11 at the end he said "no act of terror will shake our resolve". He never called the event a terrorist attack and never called the killers TERRORISTS.
- Video: AQ’s competition with ISIS means renewed focus on hitting US Ed Morrissey 30 mins ago
- The GOP comes roaring back in Colorado Noah Rothman 1 hour ago
- WSJ: Obama will require military to get his personal approval for U.S. strikes in Syria Allahpundit 1 hour ago
- Video: Scotland goes to the polls on independence Ed Morrissey 2 hours ago
- Chaffetz to DHS Secretary: Did you hear the one about the four suspected terrorists who tried to walk across the border? Ed Morrissey 3 hours ago
- The left’s war on football Noah Rothman 3 hours ago