In response to:

WH Official: Holder's Letter to Rand Paul was an Intentional Non-Answer

mhubbard Wrote: Mar 11, 2013 7:40 PM
Every person with an ounce of common sense could tell that the memo from Holder didn't promise anything. All Rand Paul's fillibuster did was expose more of Obama's plan to tear apart our country. It seems to have gained more MSM attention than any other Obama-opposing action had to date.

Here's Kevin explaining why Eric Holder's curt reply to Rand Paul's question on domestic drones is "slippery," at best:

Sen. Paul's communications team declared victory after Eric Holder sent a letter to Paul today saying that no, President Obama does not claim "the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil." ... While it sounds nice that if an American isn't "engaged in combat," she'll be safe, that still leaves the Obama Administration a lot of wiggle room. And precious little oversight.