In response to:

Obama's Little Red Phrase

Mhc Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:08 AM
Which is why the right to bear arms is guaranteed. To keep keep the federal government from infringing on the rights of state's citizens. Gun regs are not even relegated to the Feds; and as such all this gun restriction blather is rather unconstitutional...
evie10 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 11:32 AM
Robert548 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:25 AM
I bvelieve that the writings stated that the purpose of the 2nd amendment was for "protection from a tyrannical government".

Steve of CA wrote: Personally I do not own a gun and would not feel safer if I had one, but I do not have a problem with law abiding people buying guns. That being the case, I have to ask of Mr. Ransom and others here, what controls, if any, do you favor over the purchase and use of weapons, including semi-automatic weapons such as the one used by the killer in Aurora? Or do you think we have too much gun control with the laws we have now? - The American Solution: Reach for the Guns

Dear Steve,...

Tuesday, June 18 | 11:05 PM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 11:05 PM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 11:05 PM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 11:05 PM ET