In response to:

Why the Bell-Obama Connection Matters

mhalfmoon Wrote: Feb 16, 2013 12:41 PM
This is a mere statement of fact. Bell physically traveled to the violently hostile racist environment of the U.S. South to help enforce United States laws already passed by the United States Congress and signed by the President of the United States. Senator Barry Goldwater and Governor/President Ronald Reagan vigorously and vocally opposed legislation that would grant equal rights and protections to all Americans of all ethnicities. Theses are simply indisputable facts. Yet, one person replies to you that "you have it backwards...It was a Republican majority in the passing of the 'Civil Rights Act of 1964'…majority of Democrats were opposed to the act."

The verdict is in: The mainstream media believes that Derrick Bell is not a story. They believe it so deeply that they've had members of the team on national television repeatedly; they've spent thousands of words covering it; and they've mentioned it on radio and the Internet incessantly. All to say that there's nothing to see here.

Unfortunately, for President Obama, there's something to see here.

Back when President Obama was a 28-year-old student at Harvard Law, he gave a speech in support of controversial racialist Professor Derrick Bell. The raw tape of that video was parceled out in bits and pieces...