My, aren't you just a wonderful person.

You honestly think all Muslims believe that? Have you ever even met one? If I were to suggest that all Christians believe that people should be stoned for gathering sticks on a Sunday, would you agree with that statement as well?

You honestly think all Muslims believe that? Have you ever even met one? If I were to suggest that all Christians believe that people should be stoned for gathering sticks on a Sunday, would you agree with that statement as well?

As far as the socialism vs "free market" at the national level argument, I think that's a bit of a generalization. Read up on various African nations history in the last 60 years and your opinion may become a bit more nuanced. Your goal of disenfranchising those you disagree with is just disturbing though. Not that the "non-taxpayers" statement even makes a whole lot of sense as a standalone statement without way more qualifications and context being added. By some interpretations of that statement we would disenfranchise entire states (e.g. Alabama) since its citizens, in aggregate, contribute a negative amount to the national fiscal bottom line.

Hey look! A straw man! Attack it!

You must be proud of such a sophisticated, intellectual contribution to the discussion.

It's less of a "heading cheerfully toward" scenario, and more of a "permanently ingrained in the discourse of the forum" one.

Clearly the answer to the present GOP dilemma is more Sarah Palins and Michelle Bachmanns. That is, if the goal is to lose all semblance of relevance.

Clearly the answer to the present GOP dilemma is more Sarah Palins and Michelle Bachmanns. That is, if the goal is to lose all semblance of relevance.

You might want to read the constitution sometime.