In response to:

Surprise: Elizabeth Warren Can’t Define What the Phrase “Middle Class” Means

merdin Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 1:46 AM
R-Paul, M-Rubio, M-Lee, M-Pence, S-Walker, Nikki Haley, pro-USC-States-Rghts, Stop-Big-Fed-Govt-Spending, pro-fairness-to-women-policies, lots of highly-qualified US Senate, House women-Rep-candidates, starting now-2014-16 ! There are obstacles to gaining back womens support-votes, we'll have to put it back into the Rep political platform, in speeches, tv-radio-news, interviews, If we don't work at-figuring out ways to bring alot of women back in, it's over ! If we can win over the women with pro-USC-Stop-Big-Fed-Govt-Spending, pro-fairness-to-women-policies, we'll also get back the Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, Librtrn-Constn-Prty votes, that we so neglectfully-stupidly-unnecessarily-lost too, Lets all work together on getting this done !

President Obama -- along with many of the liberal Democrats in Congress -- originally defined “the rich” as couples making more than $250,000 a year. They were very specific and emphatic about how this group of taxpayers needs to pay their “fair share.” Yet, when one of the Senate’s newest -- and one of the most liberal -- members was asked to define what income groups comprise the “middle class,” she simply couldn’t do it. How remarkable:

"It’s not a numbers issue. I know you would expect a very wonky answer from me…When...