1 - 10 Next
In response to:

NBC Revives Howard Stern

Melanie45 Wrote: May 18, 2012 9:16 PM
My boys always get a kick out of AGT. As they were watching the other night, I walk in the room and my oldest asks "Who's the new judge...this Howard guy? He's pretty funny." Ugh! Not what a mom wants to hear. Hopefully, he will keep it relatively family friendly. Of course, based on some of the acts that get aired, the producers aren't too interested in doing that anyway.
Not only was it decisively defeated in NC, many of those who voted against it merely because they feared the language of the bill jeopardized unmarried heterosexual couples as well. The opposition led a very aggressive campaign. Had the wording been perceived as strictly about gay marriage, the defeat would have been staggering.
Very disturbing to think that the democrat party officials in Florida saw nothing wrong with flying this flag.
We'll see if it really gets hate crime attention. A few years back in Knoxville we had one of the most heinous crimes imaginable against a white couple that got lost in a bad area of town. As horrific as it was, there was no national media attention.
Seriously? Perhaps they should taken this same approach with ObamaCare. Instead, "we need to pass it to find out wha't in it." Anything Obama wants to support, he can find a way to justify it. Time and thought has never been a factor. Pure and simple....it was not in line with his agenda.
Exactly, Frank. Invent a crisis, even if one doesn't exist.
Seems to me if so many Catholic women are taking birth control (according to Nancy) and Catholic institutions have not been covering it, then there apparently have been no problems in obtaining it. The democrats make it seem like there is some huge injustice if they don't get birth control for free.
I see there is already an article on Hot Air stating this exact thing, but my very first thought is that this somebody needs to apologize to Bush for what they say was "lying to congress.". I think his administration's "intent" and "state of mind" was much more in-line with what they believed to be the truth at the time. Holder is simply trying to cover his backside.
Not only could he not name any one player, he claimed the White Sox' blue collar appeal is why he liked them. Then inferred that the Cubs fans were wine-sipping snobs. I thought that was his base.
In response to:

So Is Sestak a Liar?

Melanie45 Wrote: May 28, 2010 7:00 PM
If this whole thing were so "innocent", why would the WH not have cleared this up before the primary? Today they make it seem so matter of fact. Why let it loom for several months and not address it if they were confident it would not harm Obama?
1 - 10 Next