1 - 10 Next
In response to:

War (on Women)! What's it Good For?

medicineman Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 9:34 AM
Who is the nut job? Who advocated the teaching of sex in the public schools and the absence of morality as a means of preventing unwanted pregnancies among the youth? Not the moralists, but the libs. Sex education in the schools led to more pregnancies. What was your solution? Free birth control to teens. Had out condoms in the school. Most recently at the end of the prom. Next was the embrace of abortion as a solution. A pregnant female student could get an abortion with the aid of a teacher and avoid parenteral approval as well as parenteral knowledge. Any later untoward problems would be the parents' responsibilities. Teach kids that they don't have to listen to their parents. Who are the nutjobs? The libs? Not the Pro-Lifers!
In response to:

War (on Women)! What's it Good For?

medicineman Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 9:26 AM
So its a war on Women? Who started it? Is killing unborn female children a crime against women, or is preventing women from aborting female children the crime. Morality has been forgotten, libs have abandoned morality decades ago. Soon a women will be unable to purchase more than 16 oz of her favorite non-diet beverage in NYC, but will be able to abort her unborn child, especially an unwanted female. Remember the argument that the libs used in past decades about the need to prevent the birth of unwanted children, and how the unborn child was likely to be abused if it were allowed to be born. But abortion seems to me to be an abuse of a living thing. Those wonderful libs have to be protected from themselves.
In response to:

Obama's Morbid Vanity

medicineman Wrote: May 22, 2012 3:33 PM
The truly accomplished almost always acknowledge the support and help of others. We've all watched the Oscar and Emmy presentations. Few if any follow the "I did it" of BO. To wit, BO really has no accomplishments to brag about, so he must take credit when ever it is given even if it was not earned by him (NOBEL PRIZE FOR PEACE, KILLING OF BIN LADEN). He has been rewarded well in life, but has accomplished little if anything of value. So he has to direct all of the attention to himself. Has anyone come forth to thank Bo and acknowledge his help? He has succeeded by lying and twisting the truth. You can full the people some of the time, but you can't full them all the time.
In response to:

Big Lies in Politics

medicineman Wrote: May 22, 2012 1:55 PM
Democrats mean well, but are too stupid to evaluate what they have done. If they spend money to solve a problem and it does not fix the problem, they think more and more spending will solve the problem. And spending money that is not theirs is their number one go to. Their next problem is that they never think beyond their emotion to change something. They never consider that the rich will take their money elsewhere, move to a new location. They themselves are too stupid to realize that everyone else is not as stupid as they are. And they don't seem to read any papers as Katie Couric might ask, and did ask Sarah P. Don't they read about Europe, Greece especially, and Spain and Italy. Their goals make it likely that it will happen here too.
I foresee Barack becoming more of a celebrity, more of Letterman, Oprah, and Leno shows. maybe even a talk show on the radio, ala Sharpton. I see Barack as a person who has gained very much in stature at no expense to himself. No hard work, no effort, no real experience in solving problems. All of his solutions are really failures. He takes credit regularly for what others have done and blames his stupidity on others. His College Board Scores were raised 100 pts for English and Math automatically, hes was accepted into Universities for which he was less than qualified, grades probably adjusted to keep the statistics for enrolled blacks on an even keel. I saw this when he accepted the Nobel Prize for doing nothing. As in no Budget!
In response to:

Three Views on Same Sex Marriage

medicineman Wrote: May 21, 2012 6:49 PM
If we can change the definition of Marriage, i.e., the government can, here are few more words who's definitions should be changed. 1. STOP - Lets make it more lenient, and mean eventually come to rest when convenient. That would give equality to YIELD and STOP signs. And those citizens who can not STOP doing things that are offensive, immoral or illegal could enjoy the comfort that they are always in the processing of STOPPING. 2. GRADES Lets redefine an "A" grade so that answering at least one question on a test correctly would be an "A". An exam has 100 questions, you answer one correctly, you get an "A". A grade of a "B" would be for any test in which you answer at least 1 question, regardless or it being correct.
In response to:

Obama's Problem? His Record

medicineman Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 10:06 AM
Obama has never run on his record, never in his life. Did he accomplish anything notable while a State Senator? But he ran for President on a nebulous concoction called HOPE AND CHANGE, never defining anything well enough that judgement could be made. Just his good idea, lets Change things! Did he accomplish anything notable while President for 4 years? But he does take credit for things he's actually been opposed to that worked out well. Claims we're drilling for more oil today, records it as HIS accomplishment, even though they are a result of Pres. Bush's policies. Pres. Bush has been one of his favorite blame targets. We could go on with more examples of what he intended to do, failed to do, and now takes credit for.
In response to:

Our Disingenuous President

medicineman Wrote: Apr 02, 2012 11:41 AM
Oil: Cites the 2% of the refined petroleum products are held by this country, and that as a country we consume 22% of the world supply. He ignores that he is comparing the 2% in reserve to what we consume, and also fails to consider that we have more oil under the continental US than in the Middle East, and that he;s the person opposed to drilling. Big Oil: Claims that they make too much in profits, and that by raising their taxes, it will somehow benefit me. Does he think that the people who run these companies will fork out the additional taxes from their pockets? And the press ignores it all. Is the MSM the new US version of PRAVDA????
In response to:

Our Disingenuous President

medicineman Wrote: Apr 02, 2012 11:37 AM
Why does the President continue to deceive us, and worse yet where is the MSM? Why are they so complacent? Is it because he's their guy? Taxes: He compares the taxes paid by an investor (capital gains) to that paid by someone who only pays income taxes, fails to strike the difference and claims the rich aren't paying their fair share. He avoids the statistics that show that the top 1% income class pays almost 1/2 of the income taxes. Health Care: States that the Catholic Church hospitals, colleges etc. won't have to pay for abortion and OC drugs, says that the insurance provider will have to provide it free.
In response to:

There Obama Goes Again

medicineman Wrote: Mar 31, 2012 9:44 AM
And he managed to win a Nobel Prize the same way.
1 - 10 Next