In response to:

Why Are You Opposed To Ending Violence?

McGovern Wrote: Jan 13, 2013 10:21 AM
Funny: How First Amendment absolutists and extremists are always willing to denounce Second Amendments extremists!
3204 Wrote: Jan 13, 2013 4:13 PM
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 13, 2013 11:41 AM
we have ALREADY COMPROMISED and accepted restrictions on the Second;
the strict control of machine guns and "destructive devices"(large caliber guns,over .5")

Also restricted are shot-barreled rifles,sawed-off shotguns,revolver shotguns,sound suppressors.
what's left are MILITIA weapons,necessary to a free state.
the MOST protected under the 2nd.
Kirk72 Wrote: Jan 13, 2013 11:07 AM
If they are not absolutes, then they are worthless. You ever take your thoughts to their logical conclusion?
rgama Wrote: Jan 13, 2013 10:40 AM
Maybe because NEITHER Amemdtment is absolute.

There’s an epidemic in this country, something that has or will affect all of us in our lives. And the government needs to act to protect us from those who may do us harm. This plague is particularly felt in schools. The children must be made safe.

President Obama, bravely speaking out against this horror, said, “We have an obligation to ensure that our schools are safe for all our kids.” Amen, Mr. President. Amen.

The best course of action to protect as many of our citizens, particularly children, as possible is to place sensible restrictions on...

Related Tags: Media and Culture Guns