In response to:

Obama, Rubio Birthers Should Read the Law

Maxine G Wrote: May 30, 2012 12:03 PM
Even if the 'native' born ... vis-a-vis 'natural' born ... argument presented in this article were valid (which it most certainly is not), just a few (of the many) totally indisputable facts are that: (a) Obama repeatedly lied , obfuscated, and (for more then 3 years) unswervingly refused to simply permit anyone to even see any long-form birth certificate whatsoever; and (b) when he finally did submit one ... it turns out to be an obvious (and badly constructed) forgery!

Birtherism -- the belief that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, not in the United States -- pretty much died last year when the White House released a copy of the president's long-form birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961. After that, the number of Americans who doubted Obama's place of birth dropped dramatically.

But not to zero. In recent days, there has been a mini-resurgence of birther talk, from Arizona, where the secretary of state questioned Obama's eligibility to be on the ballot, to Iowa, where some Republicans want to require presidential candidates to prove...