In response to:

So Fake It’s Real: Global Warming is Reality TV for the Media Elite

Matt in N.C. Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 7:03 AM
The Rev. Thomas Malthus suggested that people reproduce exponentially, like bacteria, till they exhaust resources and die. Cogent critiques came along soon after, but technocrats and alarmists still use Malthus to belabor the masses. (Remember Ehrlich's Population Bomb? It said in 1968 that the war on hunger was over and by the '80s hundreds of millions would starve.) AGW is just a variant of the Malthusian growth model. Carefully selected temperatures are rising. If they continue at this rate, the earth will be as hot as Venus before long. In short, we're on the brink of numerous disasters, and only massive, perpetual intervention by our betters will save us. P.S.: "Reality TV" is an oxymoron.
Flubadub Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 7:42 AM
The ignorant masses are not co-operating with the starvation plan so the highly intellegent liberal social planners came up with another population control plan. That plan has eliminated 50 million Americans and now we have plenty of food, right? After all they can't complain or vote, but we found out they do scream momentarilly when they are being ripped apart in the womb.

Here’s my challenge to all the global warming apologists:

Explain to me why the “settled science” of global warming has to manipulate headlines to make information appear scarier and more threatening than the actual data shows.

If global warming is so settled, why do you and your friends take the opportunity to exaggerate, obfuscate and slant every piece of news that comes out to make it seem relevant to today?       

You can see an example of this in the headlines below:

Climate Change Main Contributor to Corn Volatility, Study Says” writes Bloomberg-BusinessWeek.