In response to:

All-Time All-Stars: Part II

MatthewlovesAyn Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 9:44 AM
I'm probably prejudiced since I have an autographed ball and he pitched for my team, but imagining that he hadn't lost 4 years to World War II, it is hard to think of a more complete pitcher than Bob Feller.
silentCalfan Wrote: Jul 11, 2012 3:08 AM
If Feller was so great how did Spahn and Sain both beat him in the 1948 series? Cleveland had the better team and won the series. Spahn did not have Feller's fastball, but he was a better pitcher than Feller.
Paulus Textor Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 10:34 AM
Yup. If Feller had pitched for the Yankees, he would be almost as revered as Babe Ruth.
MatthewlovesAyn Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 11:16 AM
Or reviled. I hate the Yankees, always have, always will. The fact that he was a Yankee is the only reason I don't like The Babe. Same for Gehrig and DiMaggio. Glad the Indians got to end Dimaggio's streak.
Steve of CA Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 9:43 PM
I trust you are not entirely serious. As a kid and a Giants fan, I hated the Dodgers but later came to realize it is just a game and also just a business.

Editor's note: This column is part II in a series. Part I can be found here.

Trying to choose the greatest pitcher of all time is at least as difficult as trying to choose the greatest hitter of all time. In both cases, the best we can do is narrow down the list.

Outside a charmed circle of five batters, no one had both a higher lifetime batting average and a higher lifetime slugging average than any of those five. In alphabetical order, they are Ty Cobb, Lou Gehrig, Rogers Hornsby, Babe Ruth and Ted Williams. There are other batters whose...

Saturday, May 18 | 07:22 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 07:22 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 07:22 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 07:22 AM ET