In response to:

Trouble in the Nanny State

Mary of MO Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 9:36 AM
I haven't read all 790 comments that have been made already before I contribute my two cents, but I suspect that the reason the Left is so concerned about these ads is that is might actually cause girls to think before they act, and, if they don't get pregnant, they won't have abortions. If they don't have abortions, abortionists won't get rich. If abortionists don't get rich, they won't have money to contribute to Leftist politicians. Etc., etc., etc.
Greg633 Wrote: Mar 16, 2013 9:53 AM
Keep it going. If teen girls don't have as many babies we won't need union workers to supply welfare benefits. Then we wouldn't have as many juvenile criminals later on and we won't need as many union police officers and union jails to protect the rest of us. The ripple effects on the taxpayors could be tremendous. Keep the signs up.
dfreyberger Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 11:35 AM
And, of course, once girls start thinking, who knows where it will end? Soon they'll stop being Left and think their way right over to the Right.
goldilocks Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 9:58 AM
m, if only we could get boys to thin before they act

miodevil is the fine line
thinking about doing it
doing it without thinking

Like the proverbial monkey typing for infinity and getting Shakespeare, Mayor Bloomberg's obsession with reforming New Yorkers' health has finally produced a brilliant ad campaign.

Posters are popping up in subway stations and bus stops giving statistics about teen pregnancy that show cute little kids saying things like, "Honestly, Mom ... chances are he won't stay with you. What happens to me?" and "I'm twice as likely not to graduate high school because you had me as a teen."

(Based on a recent CBS report, the kid could add, "Then again, I'm in the New York City public...