In response to:

Report: And the Reason Chris Christie Wasn’t Invited to CPAC is…

Mary973 Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 11:19 PM
They should have invited him and listened to his ideas for the future of the party. Whether they agree with him or not, how does not listening to contrasting viewpoints help the party? Answer, it doesn't.
Ucantwinsorry Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 11:21 PM
That is correct. Good for you.
maryanne24 Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 11:21 PM
I don't trust him so who cares what he says.
Ucantwinsorry Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 11:23 PM
She didn't say trust him, she said listen, and you don't and won't, and that's why you lost.
maryanne24 Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 11:25 PM
But Dot, why do we need someone like Christie, I mean if his policies are liberal, who needs him.
Ucantwinsorry Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 11:33 PM
You do. You aren't winning and he is. Listen up.
Mary973 Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 11:36 PM
Dot? His policies are fiscally conservative, he is pro life. Good grief, what is the litmus test these days?

Well, because he’s too squishy on Second Amendment rights, or something. National Review Online’s Eliana Johnson has the exclusive report:

New Jersey governor Chris Christie was not invited to address the Conservative Political Action Conference because of his position on gun control, according to a source familiar with CPAC’s internal deliberations who requested anonymity to speak freely.

Christie has a “limited future” in the national Republican party given his position on gun control, the source tells National Review Online. As a result, the CPAC insider says, the focus of this year’s conference, “the future of conservatism,” made...