Gun control laws are based strictly on emotions and feelings. Logic is STRICTLY forbidden.

I have no problem with capacity, and if one wants a large capacity magazine, good for them. However, for me, a .45 caliber semi-wadcutter is an excellent stopper, and the first EFFECTIVE shot ends the fight. Again, to each his own.

A .357 has much more recoil than a .45, and for me, the plow handle grip on most revolvers just doesn't "fit." I say, if one is intending to buy a gun, they should try out several different kinds and see what they like. To each his own...

No, she wasn't a mistake. She tilted the debate in Obama's favor just like she was supposed to.

Well, he might be lying, and his solutions might be worthless and maybe even counter-productive, but we have to do SOMETHING, and it's for the CHILDREN, and, and, and...

Isn't there ANYTHING that can be left up the the individual's common sense and judgment? Well, I take that back... the public was stupid enough to vote Obama in for a second term. I guess we NEED someone to take care of us...

The point is that one could keep his guns on a rack in the back window of his pickup, and they wouldn't be stolen. Gun racks "went out of style" (your choice of words says something,) when society deteriorated just enough that those guns would get stolen.

It follows that an electorate that decides it wants to be taken care of by the government would be willing to give up rights of self defense to be protected by the government. America is dead. From here on it's just a matter of picking one's way through the wreckage.

Yes, what we SHOULD do is make the schools "gun free zones." That way, a homicidal madman will be forced to leave his weapons outside. If that doesn't work, maybe we can all just light one candle, and violent crime will go away...

When libs file something like 27 ethics violations against you, NONE of which stuck, and you spend half a million dollars of your own money fighting them, it's a little hard to keep on being a governor...