1 - 10 Next
In response to:

"Wimpy" Logic Rules Washington

Mark331 Wrote: Sep 22, 2011 10:56 AM
OK, clown, who do you want to replace them with? Democrats? The dems are old-school communists
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 8:29 PM
The most ironic part of this "debate", is the complete lack of logic from the liberal camp. The vast majority of liberal thought is atheistic. Fine. Part of being human is to have your own belief system. For the sake of argument, let's assume that there is no God, Who created the universe, including human beings. That leaves evolution as the reason we exist to take part on this board. Evolution is about the survival of the fittest, for the continuation of the species. This is the first and only law. As such, homosexual/same-sex attraction is counter productive. Homosexual activity does not result in progeny. According to the dictates of evolution, homosexuals should be executed. They carry genes that damage the chance for the...
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 8:10 PM
If you don't like the stance of TownHall, take your commie traitor @ss to sites like DailyKos and Huffington Post.
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 8:03 PM
Part of the homosexual agenda is to get hate speech and hate crime laws enacted. Under these laws, it would be illegal for pastors to preach, in 100% compliance to the Bible, that homosexuality is a crime. It has already happened in other countries around the world. At face value, the first amendment would prevent that. In real life, it doesn't always work that way. DC and Chicago have for decades prevented people in those cities from possessing handguns. Totally unconstitutional, as shown by recent rulings. NYC still is enslaved by the Sullivan law. Treaties take precedence over all federal and state laws, as dictated by the Constitution. If the US signed a treaty with other nations that made opposition to homosexuality a...
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 7:55 PM
I worked with an open homosexual who admitted that the homosexual community refers to heterosexuals as "breeders." They consider that term to be an insult.
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 7:52 PM
As my dad is prone to say, "Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while." The Taliban is totally wrong on almost all fronts. Opposing homosexual perversion is one small area where it does have the right idea.
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 7:40 PM
How about equal rights for pedophiles and necrophiliacs? Is there any level of perversion that won't be accommodated.
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 7:35 PM
Apparently, bigotry is a one way street. It's OK for a gay person to say nasty things about a Christian and work to get him fired. Not OK for a Christian to object to homosexuality on moral grounds.
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 6:29 PM
Diversity is a logical fallacy. Supposedly, all views are supposed to be equal. What actually happens is that Christians are told to pound sand and silently accept immorality.
In response to:

A Queer and Present Danger

Mark331 Wrote: Jul 13, 2011 6:26 PM
In spite of the fact there is no scientific evidence of the "gay gene", I almost wish that one would be found. If that would occur, you would immediately here screaming from the gay agenda to outlaw gay-gene abortions. It would be great to see the pro-aborts and the pro-perverts attacking each other.
1 - 10 Next
Monday, June 04 | 08:27 AM ET
Monday, June 04 | 08:27 AM ET
Monday, June 04 | 08:27 AM ET
Monday, June 04 | 08:27 AM ET