In response to:

Candy Crowley Self-Destructs

MARILYN221 Wrote: Oct 19, 2012 8:54 PM
After watching the last 2 debates with the way Biden made himself look like a fool and Martha allowing him to interupt as he did and he did it non-stop and then the debate with Candy, I am almost believing that they are all Pro-Obama and how can this get by both sides I can't even see how. After Candy's enormous error half of America will always hate her. I would hate to be her. Allowing the lie will be her downfall.
Snarkasterous1 Wrote: Oct 20, 2012 12:13 AM
"Allowing the lie" would have been an embarassing transgression.

Actively promoting the lie, supporting Obozo, and taking an active libbie stance during the debate are something FAR worse, and more insidious.

While I don't hate Crowley, I hold her in contempt - much the same way I feel about most liberals, given their inability to think clearly, and to support their positions without absurd misprepresentations, such as calling forced taxpayer funding of completely unconstrained abortions "womens' access to health care."

- Snark
clocker1 Wrote: Oct 19, 2012 9:03 PM
They are pro Obama. MSM is majority democrat (if you can call the party democrat anymore). I hope that Bob Sheiffer brings some integrity to the table on Monday.

Just how badly did CNN's Candy Crowley destroy her first (and hopefully last) attempt as a presidential debate moderator? More than 65 million people saw that she is to debate moderation as CNN is to "news."

Barack Obama made a fatal mistake when he lied, claiming he'd labeled the Libya attack as an act of terrorism. The look on Romney's face said it all: Mr. President, here comes checkmate.

Then Crowley leapt to Obama's defense, declared a lie a truth, changed the subject, and Obama was free.

It was a travesty.

Let's get beyond the perennial partisan toe-taggers Rachel Maddow...