I may be missing the point, but MO is not talking to conservatives or "middle" Americans - she is referring I think to the far left base that seems to be disappointed in BO lack of progress in progressivism and she is reassuring THEM that "we have done more than they know" -- and WE KNOW how far BO has gone - that's why we are hopping mad!

Really, what is your problem with letting the people decide the GOP candidate? You have been pushing Romney forever - let it (and him) go -- conservatives are tired of Romney being called "front runner' when he is no such thing. We want a true conservative and he (and you obviously) are NOT!

Your assumption of his intelligence is not supported by fact -- we do not know what his IQ is, what his grades were, what his REAL school history is, so he is essentially made up of "dreams and aspirations" of his beloved followers..... unlike the rest of our presidential candidates who were truly vetted.

Finally, some common sense on this issue - 1 - no anchor babies 2 - no citizenship "freebies" 3 - common sense pathway to legal residence 4 - border security 5 - seriously go after visa expired aliens

I will root for GM only after the bond holders are restored their original offering and the union is kicked out. Not before then. They stole from my 90 year old mother.

My first introduction to computer-speak was a conference to introduce parents to a comprehensive immersion in computers for 4th and 5th graders. My daughter was in this group. We were told that the computer would cure the planet, soften the sun and heal all wounds (just kidding). I pointed out that the computer was just a fancy pencil and paper and "library" and was shunned the rest of the conference. I had not learned to "interface" with my child.

Maybe the founders had the right idea about not conceiving of "gay" marriage since marriage is for the procreation and protection of children in a family unit. "Gay" marriage is an oxymoron. The government has a vested interest in protecting its children and laws should reflect that. We have become anti=child in our public policies.

Go TEA Party

So who decides what is beneficial and what is destructive behavior? We have a current administration who believes in global warming -- I don't want them deciding to tax me on my consumption of energy. Economic freedom and lower taxes allow freedom of choice and that is MY CHOICE in this debate.

What really disturbs me even more than the incident itself is the "advise" the woman got from her friends, all liberals -- that she should just "suck it up" because Gore was saving the planet. Sounds more like a reaction to a cult leader (Jim Jones) than a friend to friend advise. Why should he be let off because of the planet??