1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Sex and Race Equality

Marek3 Wrote: Apr 02, 2014 12:49 PM
So basically you completely missed the point of Dr. Williams post but are yet spewing completely emotional and indignant response? The point (since you apparently missed it, unless of course you are having fun in which case I apologize) is that one can't argue discrimination purely based on percentages. Discrimination, as defined by liberals, is a purely fictional construct that has no place in any thinking person mind. We are all different culturally and physically, and due to that we can expect different results. In addition Man and Women ARE different. There should not be some silly attempts to make us equal, we aren't. Over 80% of teachers in K-4 are Women, is that something that we should make a Law about? Or simply acknowledge the reality that few Man could do those jobs without going postal? There should be NO Women in combat, only a Liberal would think that hurting our fighting capabilities is a good thing. Man are stronger, faster and more aggressive, well D'OH! Perhaps this is one reason why over 96% of prisoners are Male? BTW Women aren't being discriminated in employment that fallacy has been rebuked on so many occasion that only a fool can continue using those as an example.
On what food?
In response to:

Republicans and Blacks

Marek3 Wrote: Mar 25, 2014 2:52 PM
Ahh yes a typical Liberal argument. Because a person is Harvard educated and Black, therefore HE MUST be right. Without any thought into the simple fact that education in and of itself (and BTW what kind of education obama got is debatable since we are not allow to see it) doesn't mean you are right. It simply means you listened in some class. What YOU SAY, what YOU DO, matters. We don't care what you look like, where you come from, none of that. What we do care about is what type of a person you are and what you are doing. Unlike a Liberal who refuses to get passed skin color, we do.
In response to:

Back in the USSR?

Marek3 Wrote: Mar 24, 2014 9:59 PM
Yikes.. "Where kings were NOT absolute" darn monday.
In response to:

Back in the USSR?

Marek3 Wrote: Mar 24, 2014 8:47 PM
I disagree, while Religious freedom is indeed fundamental and a good indication of where Government ultimately will end up; it is not a first necessity. What is? Culture. A culture which doesn't understand Democracy will not have it. It isn't coincidence that America started over 1000 years ago with Saxon/Angles which had a culture where kings were absolute and each member had a say; this evolved over a very long time into our Founding Fathers. We expect countries to just become Democratic, but how? How did people therein learn about self sufficiency, self governess, self reliance? Democracy isn't a beginning it is the end, an end of a very long process. BTW I used the word "Democracy" for consistency with the Author; but I would like to point out that Democracy is just Tyranny by another name. What we really mean when we say "Democracy" is a Republic with individual Freedom.
+1 There are times when you must play, and should play fair.. than there are times when the only way to survive is to take off the gloves and get dirty. This is one of those times. If America is to survive, we must come out to fight. We must sling dirt, must get involved, must get active and loud. It is up to us now, and politeness will only ensure defeat of this nation and ultimately its destruction; for let no one ever hold delusion that America can survive, nor will as a Socialist state.
Sorry but that is a BS. The worst kind of politics. You give you enemies ammunition to get re-elected and gain nothing in return. OK So you stopped the mandates wonderful, not public won't see that as a major factor. Seriously GOP played politics as well as obama speaks without a teleprompter; which is to say none at all. Once again GOP is trying to snatch defeat from jaws of victory.
Who made her queen, darn BOSSY b*** :)
I agree with him, but with an asterisk. First of all Correlation does not imply causation. While people who get College degree do tend to have lower unemployment, that is primarily due to the fact that traditionally people who went to College already had higher values, higher capabilities and higher means than those who haven't. Secondly lately the mantra that you must get College has became a Siren call. Those who can't afford it nor have propensity for it get themselves in huge debt while getting useless degrees, such as Racial Studies. College today is a pro profit industry of the Left to turn out Left voters, not to offer opportunities. When one speaks of viability of College and how much lower the employment rate is, one should compare useful degrees (such as Engineering) with useless Degrees (Dance, Racial Studies, Women Studies, etc..). We shouldn't be pushing our kids to go into a College if they can't get something out of it. We should be pushing education, hard work, personal responsibility, etc.. Those are keys towards future success, and we must understand that what is good for one person may not be good for another.
1 - 10 Next