In response to:

Problems Solutions and Trade Offs II

marcmat Wrote: Sep 10, 2012 11:12 PM
Whether you agree with Mike Adams or not, the depth of his reasoning shows how deeply committed he is to the cause he supports. Put bluntly, he's thinking really hard about the moral implications of something that truly matters both to him and to others, even those yet to be conceived. Good for you, sir.
Most of my columns are meant to expose the hypocrisy of self-described liberals who have taken over our institutions of higher learning. However, on some occasions, I attempt to address misguided thinking among self-described conservatives. An example is my recent column “Romney and the Rapist,” which was described by many readers as either “weird” or “convoluted” or both. Those descriptions are indeed accurate and reflect the intention behind the controversial essay. It was my intention to write a column that would identify absurd arguments as a means of drawing out the flawed reasoning of those who would support Romney’s proposed rape...