In response to:

Sandra Fluke: Opposing the Contraception Mandate Is Just Like Opposing Leukemia Coverage

Marc_H Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 6:47 PM
sjk flusk and her ilk are not looking for BC pills for medical issues you moron those would be covered
sjk Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 6:50 PM
you DID NOT read her testimony. did you?
Marc_H Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 6:53 PM
fluke is a liar
plain and simple
she is a slu_t and liar
Marc_H Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 6:55 PM
fluke is a liar as obama lied about the people he told us about in passing obama-care

and her "friend" is 100% free to find anothe job with a company that has the benefits she wants

the lie people like you operate on is simple
that goverment is the only solution, that people are not responsible for their lives

you are simply a parasite, along with fluke
evie10 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 8:26 PM
Once more - with feeling this time - borrow some woman's package of BCP and see if those illnesses you mention are listed as usage for BCP. If they are not on the material included, the BCPs cannot be prescribed for them.

On MSNBC this afternoon, Sandra Fluke truly outdid herself, attempting to argue that the people who disagree with the contraception mandate on religious freedom grounds are in the same category as people who oppose insurance coverage for leukemia.

What's important to note is that some of the folks who are continuing to object to this policy are actually worried about employers who are private companies, not religiously affiliated employers in any way, but the boss has a particular religious concern, and they want to be able to deny...