In response to:

How Gays and Women Get In Their Own Way

Marc_H Wrote: Feb 04, 2013 11:55 AM
yes i do skippy they are add-ons to existing law example" fred was bet-up by tim becasue fred is gay and tim does not like gays" they're 100% unconstitutional they reason why the crime, beating up someone, is committed is relavent, should not be a crime itself.

Gays can be leaders. Women can be leaders. Without realizing it, I think gays and women inadvertently work against their own objective of equality when they force private organizations to support gay and female leaders.

As I wrote here, gays and women are already equal before the Constitution, which defines us by our humanity, not by our sexuality, and is silent on most personal matters like marriage. Furthermore, the more the federal government defines our rights, the less free, equal and human we all become.

Here is what generally happens when minority groups confuse social acceptance with equality...