1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Will 'Health Care' Kill American Medicine?

majer Wrote: Apr 09, 2014 10:04 AM
We are losing the first amendment, folks! We better wake up. Soon.
In response to:

Uninstall Firefox

majer Wrote: Apr 08, 2014 10:16 AM
It passed twice. The voters spoke and their votes were overturned--twice. What good does voting do if some judge can simply overturn the vote? We are becoming a fascist nation. Wake up people!
In response to:

Leftist Thought-Gangsters Strike Again

majer Wrote: Apr 08, 2014 9:59 AM
This is exactly what happened in Nazi Germany. Hitler and his cronies controlled all the large businesses, but the public did not know it.
People wake up! We're losing our first amendment! This episode with Mozilla tells us that we no longer have freedom of thought, freedom of conscience, or freedom of speech. And just wait till the decision about Hobby Lobby comes down in June. Along with freedom of speech, freedom of religion will be gutted. Without the first amendment, we have no rights. And this is just what obama and holder and the democrat party wants. Remember when the democrats were voting on what they wanted in their platform at their convention in 2012? They wanted any mention of God removed from the platform. For political reasons, the mayor of Los Angeles (knowing how bad a vote to remove God from the platform would look to most Americans) declared that those voting for the removal of God were outvoted. If you watched this on TV, you know that wasn't true, that the majority actually voted for the removal of the word "God" from their platform. Read "The Communist Manifesto." Everything that is happening now is in that document. God help America. Remember that the Nazis went after the Jews. In America, people are now coming after Christians.
In response to:

The 7 Reasons America Became A Great Power

majer Wrote: Apr 01, 2014 9:56 AM
Our Founders were brilliant and good men who couldn't have anticipated the corruption that we see today, so they made some mistakes. They should have put term limits on representatives and senators and they should have put a limit (10 years?) on how long a person could serve on the Supreme Court. This lack of term limits is causing us massive problems today.
In response to:

How Foreign is Our Policy?

majer Wrote: Apr 01, 2014 9:41 AM
I don't understand why many people, including you, Dr. Sowell, continue to praise obama for his rhetoric and style. He can't string six words together if he's off the teleprompter and he's always tilting his chin up to the heavens, like he's some sort of divine being. He makes me sick. I can't stand to look at him or hear his voice. When he comes on TV, my husband and I fight over who can get to the remote fastest to change the channel. He's an evil man who is destroying our country and people better wake up to that fact soon, especially young people. They will have no future if he continues to accomplish his evil goals. I'm almost 70. I won't have decades of living with the consequences of the obama presidency. If you're 20 or 30, you WILL suffer the consequences and you will come to rue the day you voted for him.
You were inaccurate, to say the least, about WMD in Iraq. Both Brigitte Gabriel and Melanie Phillips, in their books, quote Saddam Hussein's top Air Force General as saying that WMD was moved out of Iraq prior to the U.S. going into Iraq in 2003. This general says flat out that commercial passenger jets were stripped of seats, galleys, overhead bins, and lavatories and loaded with WMD and taken to Syria. Gabriel and Phillips are both well-respected and trusted in the battle to save our country and our world. Also, Bush wasn't alone in saying that WMD existed in Iraq. Many other intelligence agencies in other countries concurred.
I wonder if he similarly doesn't like Bill de Blasio, mayor of NYC, because he's married to a black woman?????
In response to:

Still One Nation Under God

majer Wrote: Feb 12, 2014 8:07 AM
There is no "separation clause" in the first amendment. There is an "establishment clause" that prohibits establishing a national religion, but there is no separation clause. I dare anyone to find it anywhere in the Constitution. The liberals have taken a phrase included in a personal letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists and run wild with it. There is no legal basis for separation of church and state in the Constitution.
In response to:

Culture of Death (Continued)

majer Wrote: Dec 17, 2013 10:53 AM
I'm very disappointed in your take, Mr. Thomas, on the 3/5 clause. So many people are ignorant about this clause and its intended purpose. It was a numeration system only and was not intended as a pronouncement on the "humanness" of a person. If this clause had not been implemented, the South would have had an overwhelming majority in the new House of Representatives, a majority that they would have kept for decades, possibly ensuring that the Civil War would have been fought in the 20th century instead of in the 19th century. That Southern majority would never have allowed slavery to be abolished. The 3/5 clause was a way to keep the representation of the South manageable and, by the way, this clause was applied equally to indigenous American Indians as well as to Black slaves. The 3/5 clause was actually the first shot across the bow (fired by the representatives from the Norhern colonies) in an attempt to end slavery. People don't seem to realize that we have the same moral dilemma going on in our own times with the abortion issue. The abortion issue has been raging all my life. The slavery issue was raging since the 1600s, and there were many people and groups working to abolish it in early America. But, how long does it take to change hearts and minds? It can take generations, as we see ourselves from the debates about abortion. Slavery was a blot on America, but it was a blot on the entire world at that time. Slavery was an accepted practice on every inhabited continent back then and had been for over 3,000 years. And, it is still practiced today. Again, how long does it take to change hearts and minds? And I might add that, as evil as slavery was, its intended purpose was not to kill people. To slaveowners, slaves were a financial investment. A sick, starving, or dead slave was of no use to a slaveowner. In contrast, the ONLY purpose of abortion is to kill. Who is worse: the slaveowners whose intention was not to kill, but to get a day's work in the fields, or the people of today who promote and practice murder--infanticide--of innocent children? You should read David Barton's (Wallbuilders.com) books about early America to learn about the truth of the 3/5 clause. Most people today are terribly ignorant of its intended purpose, including you, Mr. Thomas.
1 - 10 Next