In response to:

Let’s Have That Conversation About Guns

Mahdrof Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 8:00 PM
Many folks feel that only soldiers or police (authorities) should have access to "military" style weapons. Is anyone considering the fact that one purpose of the 2nd amendment is give citizens the right to protect themselves against a tyrannical government (remember King George)? Hitler understood that he could only seize true dictatorial powers once weapons were no longer in the hands of the people. He was, after all, only striving to accomplish his vision of a stronger Germany. Remind you of anyone else?

For once I agree with liberals. It’s high time to have a conversation about guns. Let’s start with the problem that there are far too few guns on our streets.

Wait, we can’t have that conversation. In fact, we’re not supposed to have what people might commonly describe as a “conversation” at all. We’re supposed to shut-up and listen as liberals, barely masking their unseemly delight at the opportunity, try to pin the murder rampage of one degenerate creep on millions of law-abiding Americans who did nothing wrong. The conversation is then supposed to end with us waiving our fundamental right...